On Friday 04 January 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> You have to add bandwidth to the equation. I'd guess most setups can
> spare more CPU than bandwidth. Anyway, it wouldn't be a problem if they
> can happen in parallel.
I don't agree. For people with limited bandwidth we have alternative
install
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:34:13PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> The worst (and most relevant here) constraint is on initrd size, and
> >> that is unaffected by .deb size.
> >
> > Why not move it out, then? Just unpack the necessary packages in t
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The worst (and most relevant here) constraint is on initrd size, and
>> that is unaffected by .deb size.
>
> Why not move it out, then? Just unpack the necessary packages in the target
> root so that you can decompress the rest.
If it's done using tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Otavio Salvador ha scritto:
| Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
|> On Jan 2, 2008, at 9:47 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
|>
|>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:38:37PM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
|>>> On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
|>>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:47:21AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:38:37PM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > >>On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:38:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > >>>Personally, I'd like to know what is the
Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jan 2, 2008, at 9:47 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:38:37PM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
>>> On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:38:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Personal
On Jan 2, 2008, at 9:47 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:38:37PM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:38:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Personally, I'd like to know what is the increase on space and
mem
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:38:37PM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >>On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:38:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >>>Personally, I'd like to know what is the increase on space and
> >>>memory for adding bzcat on busybox-udeb. H
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:38:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Personally, I'd like to know what is the increase on space and
memory
for adding bzcat on busybox-udeb. However, as said in another
mail, I
see no point to support differen
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:38:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> What packages in the base system are trying to use data.tar.bz2 at the
>> >> moment?
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:38:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> What packages in the base system are trying to use data.tar.bz2 at the
> >> moment?
> >
> > None, but aj noted that both debootstra
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Personally, I'd like to know what is the increase on space and memory
> for adding bzcat on busybox-udeb. However, as said in another mail, I
> see no point to support different set of features on installed and d-i
> environments (from debootstrap POV)
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What packages in the base system are trying to use data.tar.bz2 at the
>> moment?
>
> None, but aj noted that both debootstrap and cdebootstrap fail to
> unpack packages using bzip2. As dak accepts dat
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/busybox-1.1.3$ grep BZIP2 debian/config-udeb
>> # CONFIG_FEATURE_TAR_BZIP2 is not set
>>
>> I think this is critical for we
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We could of course make it work in debootstrap, by applying Marc's
> patch, but continue to disallow it in the base system.
I see no point to have something available on debootstrap that isn't
allowed on base.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 03:05:45PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What packages in the base system are trying to use data.tar.bz2 at the
> > moment?
>
> None, but aj noted that both debootstrap and cdebootstrap fail to
> unpack packages using bz
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What packages in the base system are trying to use data.tar.bz2 at the
> moment?
None, but aj noted that both debootstrap and cdebootstrap fail to
unpack packages using bzip2. As dak accepts data.tar.bz2 now,
bootstrapping could be broken by such an uploa
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:25:31AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The current debootstrap code can't handle .debs which contain a
> > data.tar.bz2 instead of a data.tar.bz. Attached is a fix.
>
> While this works on installed system, it will
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/busybox-1.1.3$ grep BZIP2 debian/config-udeb
> # CONFIG_FEATURE_TAR_BZIP2 is not set
>
> I think this is critical for we commit, or not, this patch.
Actually, the way the patch i
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:52:01AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> The current debootstrap code can't handle .debs which contain a
> data.tar.bz2 instead of a data.tar.bz. Attached is a fix.
Is it desirable for anything in the base system to use data.tar.bz2,
though? Relying on this would a
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: debootstrap
> Version: 1.0.6
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> The current debootstrap code can't handle .debs which contain a
> data.tar.bz2 instead of a data.tar.bz. Attached is a fix.
While this works on installed syste
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
The current debootstrap code can't handle .debs which contain a
data.tar.bz2 instead of a data.tar.bz. Attached is a fix.
Marc
diff -Nwru debootstrap-1.0.7/debian/control debootstrap-1.0.7.he/debian/control
--- debootstrap-1.
22 matches
Mail list logo
