On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:19:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> This issue will be further discussed during a Debian Installer team
> meeting on Wednesday next week. You can expect some decision from the
> team about whether the udebs can stay or not after that.
There is a new upstream release of g
found 430023 0.9.4-2
retitle 430023 New udebs need D-I team approval and need packaging fixes
thanks
On Friday 13 July 2007 01:48, Frans Pop wrote:
> It's up to you if you'd prefer to remove the udebs again for now, but
> my suggestion would be to wait for the result of the discussion on the
> deb
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 03:26:26AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 14 July 2007 20:15, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > - we already have parted-udeb, which I expect _does_ support GPT
> >
> > In my use case, the person who was installing had to call me because he
> > had to edit a GPT disk and did
On Saturday 14 July 2007 20:15, Robert Millan wrote:
> > - we already have parted-udeb, which I expect _does_ support GPT
>
> In my use case, the person who was installing had to call me because he
> had to edit a GPT disk and didn't know how to handle parted. With my
> proposed solution, I would
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:21:06PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 13 July 2007 09:54, Robert Millan wrote:
> > I'd like to request that the gnu-fdisk and gnu-cfdisk packages be added
> > to^W^Wkept in the D-I section of the Debian archive. There is a small
> > use case in which this is useful
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 06:17:32PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
> About the udebs, I agree that would be better to have a message on
> Debian Boot mailing list about them, before asking for them to be
> build but I also think that noone need to know about that. We ought
> write it on Developer
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:33:40PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 13 July 2007 09:44, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Ok, but please let's not make a big fuss of this. The udebs were just
> > added to the archive, not to D-I.
>
> And you also added them to all CD images...
Doesn't "extra" priority
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 13 July 2007 21:38, Geert Stappers wrote:
>> The only "risk" I see, is the udeb Package file be coming fat. D-I won't
>> fetch udebs it doesn't need, so no harm, no conflicts, no problems.
>
> Apparently you are having problems understanding my ar
On Friday 13 July 2007 21:38, Geert Stappers wrote:
> The only "risk" I see, is the udeb Package file be coming fat. D-I won't
> fetch udebs it doesn't need, so no harm, no conflicts, no problems.
Apparently you are having problems understanding my arguments. Please read
my earlier mails again.
>
> OK, so basically the only reason is that the regular fdisk and cfdisk do
> not support GPT partition tables?
>
> In that case, I think we should _not_ add these udebs, for the following
> reasons:
> - we already have parted-udeb, which I expect _does_ support GPT
> - the new udebs conflict
On Friday 13 July 2007 09:44, Robert Millan wrote:
> Ok, but please let's not make a big fuss of this. The udebs were just
> added to the archive, not to D-I.
And you also added them to all CD images...
> And I requested it out of ignorance, not malice
I'm sorry if this seems like making a big
On Friday 13 July 2007 09:54, Robert Millan wrote:
> I'd like to request that the gnu-fdisk and gnu-cfdisk packages be added
> to^W^Wkept in the D-I section of the Debian archive. There is a small
> use case in which this is useful:
>
> - You start an install using GPT.
> - You manually edit t
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:30:14AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > It's up to you if you'd prefer to remove the udebs again for now, but my
> > suggestion would be to wait for the result of the discussion on the
> > debian-boot list. As far as I'm concerned it is up to Robert to initiate
> > tha
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:23:55AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 13 July 2007 01:48, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I was quite surprised to see the two new udebs from your source package
> > gnu-fdisk appear. Mainly because there has not been any discussion by
> > Robert about adding them with the res
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:48:17AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Hello Julien,
>
> I was quite surprised to see the two new udebs from your source package
> gnu-fdisk appear. Mainly because there has not been any discussion by
> Robert about adding them with the rest of the D-I team and the D-I
> r
On Friday 13 July 2007 02:23, Frans Pop wrote:
> The main reasons for this are:
> - the size of installation images should not be increased without
> discussion
> - every new udeb may need to be excluded in debian-cd
> - migration for all udebs needs to be consciously managed (which mostly
> fa
On Friday 13 July 2007 01:48, Frans Pop wrote:
> Of course, this is not really your problem, but more a problem within
> the D-I team. For now however, it does mean that your package is
> blocked from migrating to testing [1] until we have discussed the need
> for the udebs in the team.
Additional
On Friday 13 July 2007 01:48, Frans Pop wrote:
> I was quite surprised to see the two new udebs from your source package
> gnu-fdisk appear. Mainly because there has not been any discussion by
> Robert about adding them with the rest of the D-I team and the D-I
> release managers in particular.
Le
Hello Julien,
I was quite surprised to see the two new udebs from your source package
gnu-fdisk appear. Mainly because there has not been any discussion by
Robert about adding them with the rest of the D-I team and the D-I
release managers in particular. As we do always try to limit the size of
19 matches
Mail list logo
