On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:55:06 -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Frans Pop wrote:
>> Are we talking about the same thing here?
>>
>> I thought the consensus was that selinux should be added as a
>> separate standard (enabled by default) task to tasksel for Etch and
>> not the packages pr
Frans Pop wrote:
> Are we talking about the same thing here?
>
> I thought the consensus was that selinux should be added as a separate
> standard (enabled by default) task to tasksel for Etch and not the
> packages promoted to priority standard.
No, we've been talking about making the packages
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 01:59, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > Anything preventing you from adding it now?
>
> Lack of write access to the override files on ftp-master. :-)
>
> Everything else should fall out from that, so only a ftpmaster is
> needed.
Are we talking about the same th
Frans Pop wrote:
> Anything preventing you from adding it now?
Lack of write access to the override files on ftp-master. :-)
Everything else should fall out from that, so only a ftpmaster is
needed.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 21:25, Joey Hess wrote:
> However, it it's to be made standard, it should be done soon; debian-cd
> will need to be updated, we'll need time to deal with any breakage that
> should ensue, and the freeze is rapidly approaching.
Anything preventing you from adding it now?
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Ok but including packages in standard installation at this point of
> release isn't right from my POV. That's why I proposed to use a task
> in this case.
The only thing I anticipate causing any problem is the added size to the
standard system, but 2 mb is really not that
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:44:55 +0200, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tuesday 03 October 2006 01:08, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > We are at a point where we can support a targeted SELinux
>> > policy, at least in permissive mode, I su
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:55:10 -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Ok but including packages in standard installation at this point of
> release isn't right from my POV. That's why I proposed to use a task
> in this case.
Well. These are packages that make some options avail
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 03 October 2006 01:08, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > We are at a point where we can support a targeted SELinux
>> > policy, at least in permissive mode, I suggest that we ship SELinux
>> > i
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 01:08, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We are at a point where we can support a targeted SELinux
> > policy, at least in permissive mode, I suggest that we ship SELinux
> > installed, but turned off by default; and a RE
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We are at a point where we can support a targeted SELinux
> policy, at least in permissive mode, I suggest that we ship SELinux
> installed, but turned off by default; and a README or a short shell
> script fr the local administrator to en
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
We are at a point where we can support a targeted SELinux
policy, at least in permissive mode, I suggest that we ship SELinux
installed, but turned off by default; and a README or a short shell
script fr the local administrator to enabl
12 matches
Mail list logo
