Hi, Michael. Thanks for the response. Comments below.
On Fri, 06 May 2011 19:56:46 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> initramfs-tools does not depend on busybox indeed, but it
> recommends busybox|busybox-initramfs. With default apt
> settings that basically translates to depends, since
> all Rec
06.05.2011 18:09, Bastian Blank wrpte:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 05:55:58PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 15.01.2008 01:03, Jameson Rollins wrote:
>>> Hello. I would like to get an update on the status of this bug.
>>> Right now, busybox-static is basically uninstallable on any system
>>> that
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 05:55:58PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 15.01.2008 01:03, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> > Hello. I would like to get an update on the status of this bug.
> > Right now, busybox-static is basically uninstallable on any system
> > that needs initramfs-tools, which I imagine is
Replying to an old bugreport...
15.01.2008 01:03, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Hello. I would like to get an update on the status of this bug.
> Right now, busybox-static is basically uninstallable on any system
> that needs initramfs-tools, which I imagine is most. The proposed
> solution would wor
Hello. I would like to get an update on the status of this bug.
Right now, busybox-static is basically uninstallable on any system
that needs initramfs-tools, which I imagine is most. The proposed
solution would work, ie. set "Provides: busybox". I would really like
to use this tool but can't at
Package: busybox-static
Severity: normal
Hi,
when I try to install busybox-static, then the already installed
package busybox gets removed. This is ok.
But: all packages depending on "busybox" also get removed (e.g.
initramfs-tools) - even if this should not be necessary - right?
One solution wo
6 matches
Mail list logo
