On Sunday 26 February 2006 17:15, Pierrot wrote:
> I have a doubt on this as the daily build I get today which is of
> 25/02/2006 is using 2.6.12-1.
This was a known issue since last week due to problems with the
preparation of the new Beta2 release. Sorry about the confusion.
The links for the
Am Montag, 27. Februar 2006 03:47 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:58:55PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 February 2006 19:05, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Since two days, the daily builds are etch_d-i images. Those are
> > > currently broken. They have something lik
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:58:55PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 26 February 2006 19:05, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Since two days, the daily builds are etch_d-i images. Those are
> > currently broken. They have something like 2.6.12 kerneland 2.6.15
> > modules or whateverand are f
On Sunday 26 February 2006 19:05, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Since two days, the daily builds are etch_d-i images. Those are
> currently broken. They have something like 2.6.12 kerneland 2.6.15
> modules or whateverand are for this reason broken.
I will try to sort out this whole mess tomo
Quoting Pierrot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi there,
>
> Christian, you said daily images were using kernel 2.6.15 as of february
> the 10th.
>
> I have a doubt on this as the daily build I get today which is of
> 25/02/2006 is using 2.6.12-1.
This is because on Feb 10th, the daily builds were sid
Hi there,
Christian, you said daily images were using kernel 2.6.15 as of february the
10th.
I have a doubt on this as the daily build I get today which is of 25/02/2006
is using 2.6.12-1.
Do I missed an information somewhere or is this daily not the good one ?
Second point, I am having tr
6 matches
Mail list logo
