Re: Bug#248590: sparcstation lx beta 4 install (mostly ok)

2004-05-14 Thread Blars Blarson
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Needed to add "ramdisk_size=3D8192" to command line. > >Have you ben able to check if this problem is fixed in the daily builds? This problem does not happen with the 2004-05-11 daily. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#248590: sparcstation lx beta 4 install (mostly ok)

2004-05-13 Thread Joey Hess
Blars Blarson wrote: > > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/beta4/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso > > Needed to add "ramdisk_size=8192" to command line. Have you ben able to check if this problem is fixed in the daily builds? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description:

Bug#248590: sparcstation lx beta 4 install (mostly ok)

2004-05-13 Thread Blars Blarson
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:34:01PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > DHCP worked second time. > > Quite a few people see this; we're not sure exactly what it is > (whether it's a race, or if slow machines just take more than 10 > seconds.) This appears to be a race. > > partman still won't part

Bug#248590: sparcstation lx beta 4 install (mostly ok)

2004-05-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-12 01:54]: > Same sparcstation LX as previous reports. All problems have been seen > before. The other report is #246066. > DHCP worked second time. Quite a few people see this; we're not sure exactly what it is (whether it's a race, or if slow machi

Bug#248590: sparcstation lx beta 4 install (mostly ok)

2004-05-12 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sparc beta4 netinst http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/beta4/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso Date: 2004-05-09 Method: How did you install? netinstall cd What did you boot off? cdrom