So, what is the current situation of this bug? Are you willing me to
improve the patch? If so, in what ways should it be improved?
Cheers,
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
`-
Hi,
Le samedi 10 novembre 2007 à 15:58 +0100, Miro Dietiker a écrit :
> I followed this discussion and finally thought about what are we using
> tmpfiles for...
> I see some typical applications where huge tmp comes into place:
> Say i'm processing huge amount of data (but i'm not using a
> d
I followed this discussion and finally thought about what are we using
tmpfiles for...
Josselin Mouette schrieb:
Le samedi 10 novembre 2007 à 14:44 +0100, Frans Pop a écrit :
D-I does allow setting up a system without swap and I have seen installation
reports where users actually did that.
Le samedi 10 novembre 2007 à 14:44 +0100, Frans Pop a écrit :
> D-I does allow setting up a system without swap and I have seen installation
> reports where users actually did that.
There's nothing we can do against users shooting themselves in the foot.
> Of course, in most cases that will
>
On Saturday 10 November 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> The only case where this will cause trouble is when there isn't enough
> swap. In this case, real memory will start to be used for unused pages,
> not leaving enough memory for caching files, which can cause giant
> performance issues. By defa
On Saturday 10 November 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Well, I can't check whether this will actually break D-I because I don't
> have a test environment, but AIUI the attached patch should do the
> trick.
Testing D-I is trivial using for example qemu or virtualbox. As all you're
changing is sim
Le samedi 10 novembre 2007 à 12:52 +0100, Frans Pop a écrit :
> I wonder whether this shouldn't include a check for minimal available RAM
> size.
>
> Is tmpfs still a good idea for systems with little RAM?
> I'm thinking NSLU, m68k, older 486/Pentiums, etc.
I think so. The reason is that on such
On Saturday 10 November 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 10 novembre 2007 à 06:13 +, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> > So, actually, I don't think there would be any strong opposition of
> > the remaining D-I team members for such change...as long as someone
> > takes the task of working
Hi,
Le samedi 10 novembre 2007 à 06:13 +, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> So, actually, I don't think there would be any strong opposition of
> the remaining D-I team members for such change...as long as someone
> takes the task of working on it (without breaking D-I, you would have
> guessed).
Quoting Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> do you intend to change this for lenny? The change is absolutely
> trivial, and has very positive side effects, like the guarantee of a
> usable system even if all filesystems are full.
>
> Given the current memory requirements of debian-ins
Hi,
do you intend to change this for lenny? The change is absolutely
trivial, and has very positive side effects, like the guarantee of a
usable system even if all filesystems are full.
Given the current memory requirements of debian-installer, I don't think
there is a target system for which it
11 matches
Mail list logo
