On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:37:25PM +0200, Pip Oomen wrote:
> Hehe... that shows I am too used to CVS. Ran "svn up" and got the
> changed version, which does just seem to rollback the previous change
> though ;)
cvs diff does just the same, only shows you your local changes.
Kurt
--
To UNSU
Pip Oomen wrote:
> I just ran a "svn diff" against the repository and still find just a
> single parameter to the di_exec call on line 105. Are you sure the fix
> was checked in?
Yes, it was changed to call di_exec_shell.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hehe... that shows I am too used to CVS. Ran "svn up" and got the
changed version, which does just seem to rollback the previous change
though ;)
Mvh,
Pepijn.
Per Olofsson wrote:
"svn diff" only shows the difference between your working copy and
what's in your .svn/text-base directories. You
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 20:06 +0200, Pip Oomen wrote:
> I just ran a "svn diff" against the repository and still find just a
> single parameter to the di_exec call on line 105. Are you sure the fix
> was checked in?
"svn diff" only shows the difference between your working copy and
what's in you
I just ran a "svn diff" against the repository and still find just a
single parameter to the di_exec call on line 105. Are you sure the fix
was checked in?
Regards,
Pepijn.
This is fixed in subversion, and I guess it was being built from
subversion.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Package: debian-installer
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: no longer builds from source
When building netcfg udeb, it fails with:
netcfg-common.c: In function `netcfg_activate_dhcp':
netcfg-common.c:1102: error: too few arguments to function `di_exec'
-- System Information:
Debian Rele
6 matches
Mail list logo
