Bug#240697: acknowledged by developer (closing)

2004-03-29 Thread Joey Hess
C. Gatzemeier wrote: > An entire new version of d-i is needed to change the default entries generated > by the mirror chooser in the sources.list? In its most common form the installer consists of a CD image, yes. > That would also be the case > changing from sarge to stable when releasing. If

Bug#240697: acknowledged by developer (closing)

2004-03-29 Thread C. Gatzemeier
Am Montag, 29. März 2004 17:08 schrieb Joey Hess: > > -- Have prerelease installs default to point to the fixed name (sarge) > > > > -- At release time change installation default to point to stable as > > usual, and issue a security patch to change explicit sarge systems to > > point to stable.

Bug#240697: acknowledged by developer (closing)

2004-03-29 Thread Joey Hess
C. Gatzemeier wrote: > To provide for both ends I'd suggest: > > -- Have prerelease installs default to point to the fixed name (sarge) > > -- At release time change installation default to point to stable as usual, > and issue a security patch to change explicit sarge systems to point to >

Bug#240697: acknowledged by developer (closing)

2004-03-29 Thread C. Gatzemeier
Am Sonntag, 28. März 2004 23:03 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System: > We do not want a vast quantity of users with > "sarge" in their sources.list, who will then be left without security > updates and a trivial upgrade path when sarge+1 is released. OK, now I got it, we where thinking in differen

Bug#240697: acknowledged by developer

2004-03-28 Thread C. Gatzemeier
Hi, I perfectly understand your reasoning, but frakly not quite the conlusion. > We do not want a vast quantity of users with > "sarge" in their sources.list, who will then be left without security > updates and a trivial upgrade path when sarge+1 is released. Yes, that's me ;-) I'd like my ma