* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-23 15:08]:
> We could not obtain an IP address from the network
> through DHCP. DHCP is a system to automatically obtain IP addresses
> from a central server on your network. Sometimes, DHCP servers are
> slow, so perhaps you might want to try this again. Alter
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 03:08:46PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Perhaps something like
>
> We could not obtain an IP address from the network
> through DHCP. DHCP is a system to automatically obtain IP addresses
> from a central server on your network. Sometimes, DHCP servers are
> slow, so
* Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-21 12:05]:
> _Description: Do you want to retry DHCP network configuration?
> No IP address was offered during DHCP network configuration. DHCP
> servers are sometimes really slow. If you wish, you can retry.
>
> Do you have any suggestions on how
Am Sam, den 20.12.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 18:33:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Why do you ask for the debconf priority at the beginning? I think it
> should just be "high" by default and people who want something lower can
> pass "DEBCONF_PRIORITY". I guess/hope this is currently
* Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-21 09:02]:
> Its only logical that setting the priority should happen after the user
> has choosen a language, that way they have a better chance of
> understanding the issue.
Most users simply won't need it at all; and those you do can read
about it in
* Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-20 21:24]:
> > Why do you ask for the debconf priority at the beginning? I think it
> > should just be "high" by default and people who want something lower can
> > pass "DEBCONF_PRIORITY". I guess/hope this is currently only asked for
> > testing, and
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 18:33:56 +0100
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do you ask for the debconf priority at the beginning? I think it
> should just be "high" by default and people who want something lower
> can pass "DEBCONF_PRIORITY". I guess/hope this is currently only
> asked
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-20 18:33]:
> At some point I went into the partition a hard drive menu. It showed me:
>
> Finish
> I chose my hard drive, got into cfdisk, did my stuff and quit. After that,
> the menu was on the hard drive again. I think it should be one menu item
> f
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-20 18:33]:
> Since I didn't have or want a network, I wanted to choose "Detect and mount
> CD-ROM" next. However, that would show the DHCP error again. I could only
> continue after manually configuring an IP address. Please don't assume I
> want a network just
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 06:33:56PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
[...]
> Why do you ask for the debconf priority at the beginning? I think it
> should just be "high" by default and people who want something lower can
> pass "DEBCONF_PRIORITY". I guess/hope this is currently only asked for
> test
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: daily built from 17-Dec-2003
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
sarge-i386-netinst.iso 17-Dec-2003 07:34 120M
uname -a: 2.4.22
Date: Sat Dec 20 18:07:00 CET 2003
Method: boot from IDE CD-ROM, us
11 matches
Mail list logo
