On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Geert Stappers wrote:
> You look to me like a person that is proud about his antispam filters,
> but that forgets that he is blocking the good guys also.
About 90% of what I drop is spam. As I think of improvements, I
implement them.
However, I do monitor, and I am well-awar
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:15:27AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:34:55PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Please, don't mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], my antispam
> > > filters treat it as spam.
> >
> > I wonder how ma
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:34:55PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Please, don't mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], my antispam
> > filters treat it as spam.
>
> I wonder how maintainers are supposed to do anything with this bug
> report in the event that it
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:34:55PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please, don't mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], my antispam
> filters treat it as spam.
I wonder how maintainers are supposed to do anything with this bug
report in the event that it gets reassigned to a package whose bugs
don't go to a
Package: boot-floppies
Version: Current CVS
dbootstrap/net-fetch.c gives no choice of kernel when fetching the
kernel from the network (http/ftp).
It unconditionally fetches a 2.2 kernel. Many recent computers _require_
a 2.4 kernel.
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
Please, don't mail to [EMAIL PRO
5 matches
Mail list logo
