[Matt Kraai]
> I did that and it worked. kernel-installer promptly fails, but it
> looks like pere has already fixed it in CVS. Why aren't
> debian-installer/kernel/* set?
I only reduced the severity of the problem (making defaults
available), and made the problem more visible (printing errors
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:33:53PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 08:21:48AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > Uh, so we need to
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/usr/lib:/lib:/target/usr/lib:/target/lib
> > ?
>
> yes, i think so
I did that and it worked. kernel-installer promptly fails,
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 08:21:48AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:17:29PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:30:15AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > it breaks if we want to use files or mounts from the installer root.
> Does it use any now?
no, because i
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:17:29PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:30:15AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > Bastian, care to comment?
>
> it breaks if we want to use files or mounts from the installer root.
Does it use any now?
> so i disagree with this option. we rather wan
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:30:15AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Bastian, care to comment?
it breaks if we want to use files or mounts from the installer root.
so i disagree with this option. we rather want to use the glibc from
/lib which is supposed to be backward compatible.
bastian
--
Warp 7 -
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:21:51PM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
> The following patch fixes this problem.
> I'm somewhat hesitent to apply it though, since I didn't
> write the original trickery, and I'm still not sure why
> they didn't use chroot in the first place.
Bastian, care to comment?
Matt
--
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:21:51PM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
> tag 179994 + patch
> thanks.
>
> The following patch fixes this problem.
> I'm somewhat hesitent to apply it though, since I didn't
> write the original trickery, and I'm still not sure why
> they didn't use chroot in the first place.
>
tag 179994 + patch
thanks.
The following patch fixes this problem.
I'm somewhat hesitent to apply it though, since I didn't
write the original trickery, and I'm still not sure why
they didn't use chroot in the first place.
Index: tools/base-installer/debian/postinst
==
8 matches
Mail list logo
