Bug#135504: Bug reproduced

2002-03-04 Thread Phil Blundell
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 11:12, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > Eduard Bloch wrote on Mon Mar 04, 2002 um 11:26:36AM: > > > > Kernel threads can become zombies in exactly the same way as any other > > > process, ie if they die and their parent doesn't call wait. As a > > > temporary hack, try som

Bug#135504: Bug reproduced

2002-03-04 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Eduard Bloch wrote on Mon Mar 04, 2002 um 11:26:36AM: > > Kernel threads can become zombies in exactly the same way as any other > > process, ie if they die and their parent doesn't call wait. As a > > temporary hack, try something like this: > > Will do, and prepend a sync() in del_l

Bug#135504: Bug reproduced

2002-03-04 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Phil Blundell wrote on Mon Mar 04, 2002 um 10:20:37AM: > Looks like a kernel bug. Looks so. > Kernel threads can become zombies in exactly the same way as any other > process, ie if they die and their parent doesn't call wait. As a > temporary hack, try something like this: Will do,

Bug#135504: Bug reproduced

2002-03-04 Thread Phil Blundell
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 23:17, Eduard Bloch wrote: > I was able to reproduce this bug while hacking at the new cdrom > auto-detection functions. It is simple: use bf2.4 flavor and try to > install kernel&modules twice. Then you can see a [loop0] _Zombie_ > process, which apparently locks the file wh

Bug#135504: Bug reproduced

2002-03-03 Thread Eduard Bloch
severity 135504 serious thanks Hello, I was able to reproduce this bug while hacking at the new cdrom auto-detection functions. It is simple: use bf2.4 flavor and try to install kernel&modules twice. Then you can see a [loop0] _Zombie_ process, which apparently locks the file which has been moun