On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 23:59:30 -0800
"John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but i was able to get it to be quiet about the slang1-utf8 stuff (hollow
> victory, it turns out)
>
> so we have boot-floppies that are not compiling anywhere
Somehow, b-f build process is b0rked.
We had two
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:03:19PM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
>
> oh, i think i see it: comparing dpkg --get-selections in each chroot, i
> see sid has this: slang1a-utf8
>
> let me see if this is the case...
no; it is not quite that simple. installing libnewt-utf8-0 removes
libnewt-dev
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 11:34:05AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> David Kimdon wrote on Tue Feb 19, 2002 um 10:48:22PM:
> > Can someone summarize what needs to be done to make boot-floppies
> > buildable again?
>
> With the split of libslang, we need following programs which link against the
> .UTF
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 11:34:05AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > Currently I can't satisfy 'make check'. This bug (#134045) ended up
> > talking about nano, but it still isn't clear to me what we need for
> > boot-floppies.
> With the split of libslang, we need following programs which link agai
#include
David Kimdon wrote on Tue Feb 19, 2002 um 10:48:22PM:
> Can someone summarize what needs to be done to make boot-floppies
> buildable again?
>
> Currently I can't satisfy 'make check'. This bug (#134045) ended up
> talking about nano, but it still isn't clear to me what we need for
> b
Can someone summarize what needs to be done to make boot-floppies
buildable again?
Currently I can't satisfy 'make check'. This bug (#134045) ended up
talking about nano, but it still isn't clear to me what we need for
boot-floppies.
Bug #132990 may be slang/newt related, I'd like to figure out
6 matches
Mail list logo
