maybe i am missing something, but i built a stable chroot, apt-got
boot-floppies, and am trying to build them.
however, i am running into a chicken/egg problem. for i386, the kernel
is 2.2.19pre17. however, there is no vanilla kernel, and if i bump it up
to 2.2.19, there are no PCMCIA modules.
i
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 01:45:45PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:31:23PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > > If I recall, building on m68k in particular needs a lot of files
> > > > external to CVS for some r
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:31:23PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > If I recall, building on m68k in particular needs a lot of files
> > > external to CVS for some reason. Poor ghetto port that it is.
> >
> > The bootstra.tpp file is the only on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 90967 + fixed
Bug#90967: Debian installer not recognizing high-numbered HD?
Bug#72672: [i386] problem trying to install to hdg
Bug#78328: hdg and hdh are not showing up as possible disks for partitioning
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 90967 + fixed
Bug#90967: Debian installer not recognizing high-numbered HD?
Bug#72672: [i386] problem trying to install to hdg
Bug#78328: hdg and hdh are not showing up as possible disks for partitioning
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processin
Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If I recall, building on m68k in particular needs a lot of files
> > external to CVS for some reason. Poor ghetto port that it is.
>
> The bootstra.tpp file is the only one I've actually come across so far.
> Perhaps a mention of it in the readme
Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd /really/ like to be able to do them with 2.2.19 kernels though.
> Currently they all have the 2.2.17 kernel from potato, except for the
> mac disks as there doesn't seem to be a 2.2.17 for it, so I've nabbed
> the 2.2.19 from unstable to check t
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 03:08:38PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > > Unless you're volunteering?
> >
> > I'm currently working on them. Or at least trying to build them (and I
> > appear to have got Atari, Amiga, Mac & vme6000 done). It's a slow
> > process however.
>
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > Unless you're volunteering?
>
> I'm currently working on them. Or at least trying to build them (and I
> appear to have got Atari, Amiga, Mac & vme6000 done). It's a slow
> process however.
Wow! Great!
Regards,
Joey
--
GNU GPL: "The source will be with
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 08:39:43PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 03:23:32PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > Is there anything else holding up 2.2.23? Can I tag it, or do you
> > > want to?
> >
> > I haven't looke
Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 03:23:32PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Is there anything else holding up 2.2.23? Can I tag it, or do you
> > want to?
>
> I haven't looked at the CVS, but unless someone's fixed it 2.2.22 is
> broken for m68k - the
rt -r release_2-2-23 -d boot-floppies-2.2.23 boot-floppies
(FYI, in woody, you can just use cvs-buildpackage. Woot!)
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 03:23:32PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Is there anything else holding up 2.2.23? Can I tag it, or do you
> want to?
I haven't looked at the CVS, but unless someone's fixed it 2.2.22 is
broken for m68k - there's no bootstra.ttp file in m68k-specials (it's
the Atari
Is there anything else holding up 2.2.23? Can I tag it, or do you want to?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Monta Vista Software Debian Security Team
"I am croutons!"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
14 matches
Mail list logo
