Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:21:05AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:04:50PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
By spreading data over multiple partitions with great gobs of free space
between small (after install) amounts of
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:36:31AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Really, Linux or Windows, it is bad idea to fill actively used disk up
> to 98%. (For your case / partition. /boot may be OK since it is
> practically read-only.) For Linux, 90-95%, for windows 60-70% is my
> common sense usage.
Oo
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:21:05AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:04:50PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> By spreading data over multiple partitions with great gobs of free space
> between small (after install) amounts of data, you're forcing lon
Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:04:50PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
I have just installed another system, and took the time to try to
familiarise myself with the partitioning tool.
I was running a 2.6 kernel, and the install kernel's date is Jul 29 06:24.
The install target
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:04:50PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> I have just installed another system, and took the time to try to
> familiarise myself with the partitioning tool.
>
> I was running a 2.6 kernel, and the install kernel's date is Jul 29 06:24.
>
> The install target was
I have just installed another system, and took the time to try to
familiarise myself with the partitioning tool.
I was running a 2.6 kernel, and the install kernel's date is Jul 29 06:24.
The install target was a Pentium II, 350 Mhz, 64 Mb RAM and 3.2 Gbytes
of disk.
It seemed to me that the se
6 matches
Mail list logo
