Re: Allowing for different kernel revisions

2004-02-10 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:13:08PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > I'd like to split this up into common-2.2, common-2.4, common-2.6 so > > that various module renames can be handled sanely. > I have been trying to think of a way that wouldn't be specific to > 2.4/2.6, since module renames happen in

Re: Allowing for different kernel revisions

2004-02-10 Thread Joey Hess
Jeff Bailey wrote: > In linux-kernel-di/modules/common, everything is done with the > assumption of a 2.4 kernel. > > I'd like to split this up into common-2.2, common-2.4, common-2.6 so > that various module renames can be handled sanely. > > This does mean that new module lists will need to be

Re: Allowing for different kernel revisions

2004-02-10 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:57:08PM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: > In linux-kernel-di/modules/common, everything is done with the > assumption of a 2.4 kernel. > > I'd like to split this up into common-2.2, common-2.4, common-2.6 so > that various module renames can be handled sanely. > > This does m

Allowing for different kernel revisions

2004-02-09 Thread Jeff Bailey
In linux-kernel-di/modules/common, everything is done with the assumption of a 2.4 kernel. I'd like to split this up into common-2.2, common-2.4, common-2.6 so that various module renames can be handled sanely. This does mean that new module lists will need to be added in 3 places. Thoughts? Tk