Processed: Re: user-setup: set SYSTEMD_SULOGIN_FORCE=1 in env for rescue/emergency.service when root account is locked

2023-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/user-setup/-/merge_requests/6 Bug #952450 [user-setup] user-setup: set SYSTEMD_SULOGIN_FORCE=1 in env for rescue/emergency.service when root account is locked Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Bug#952450: user-setup: set SYSTEMD_SULOGIN_FORCE=1 in env for rescue/emergency.service when root account is locked

2023-10-10 Thread James Addison
Package: user-setup Followup-For: Bug #952450 Control: forwarded -1 https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/user-setup/-/merge_requests/6

Bug#952450: user-setup: set SYSTEMD_SULOGIN_FORCE=1 in env for rescue/emergency.service when root account is locked

2023-06-03 Thread James Addison
sment. My understanding from the relevant manual[1] is that 'emergency.target' is a similar, albeit even more basic systemd state that is automatically selected if early boot preconditions fail and/or when serious errors occur. The system used for testing has a locked root user account, but is

Bug#994066: flash-kernel: kernel size check doesn't take appended device tree into account

2021-09-10 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
ctions @@ -855,7 +855,10 @@ if [ -n "$mtd_kernel" ]; then check_char_dev "$kmtd" kmtdsize=$(mtdsize "$mtd_kernel") kreqsize=$kfilesize - check_mtd_size "$mtd_kernel" $kreqsize $kmtdsize kernel + + # The actual check is done l

Bug#994066: flash-kernel: kernel size check doesn't take appended device tree into account

2021-09-10 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.104 Severity: normal Hello, when the active machine entry has an "Mtd-Kernel" field, flash-kernel checks if the kernel fits into the specified mtd partition. However if the machine entry also has "DTB-Append: yes" the image written to said partition is a combinati

Bug#952450: user-setup: set SYSTEMD_SULOGIN_FORCE=1 in env for rescue/emergency.service when root account is locked

2021-04-11 Thread Michael Biebl
tation is that distributions should now > put service override files to set this environment variable. > > Thus user-setup should create the appropriate configuration file when > the root account is not configured. Maybe this should be controlled > by some low priority debconf questio

Bug#977214: marked as done (debian-installer: Please allow underscore in username of first account)

2021-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:49:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#977214: fixed in user-setup 1.88 has caused the Debian Bug report #977214, regarding debian-installer: Please allow underscore in username of first account to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#977214: debian-installer: Please allow underscore in username of first account

2020-12-12 Thread John Lines
Package: debian-installer Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@paladyn.org Dear Maintainer, If a system has a number of users then more that one will have the same first name. After the initial install it is possible to add users with names such as john_lines, but this is not permitted for the f

Bug#777474: marked as done (Saving logs to first-user account just installed (wishlist))

2020-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 6 Aug 2020 09:48:07 +0200 with message-id <20200806094807.1966cbbb91ce0f9e1b2db...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 3 has caused the Debian Bug report #777474, regarding Saving logs to first-user account just ins

Re: Add my guest account to my debian-installer project.

2020-03-28 Thread Holger Wansing
Hello Ebrahim, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ahlan Ebrahim, > > ebrahim ouadoud (2020-03-25): > > Hello, I am a system architect, and my project is to add my native language > > (Moroccan Darija) to the Debian installation system and to the Debian doc. > > Please add my

Re: Add my guest account to my debian-installer project.

2020-03-28 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Ahlan Ebrahim, ebrahim ouadoud (2020-03-25): > Hello, I am a system architect, and my project is to add my native language > (Moroccan Darija) to the Debian installation system and to the Debian doc. > Please add my Guest account to the debian-installer project. ID: @ > eouadoud

Add my guest account to my debian-installer project.

2020-03-25 Thread ebrahim ouadoud
Hello, I am a system architect, and my project is to add my native language (Moroccan Darija) to the Debian installation system and to the Debian doc. Please add my Guest account to the debian-installer project. ID: @ eouadoud-guest. Best regards *Ebrahim*

Bug#952450: user-setup: set SYSTEMD_SULOGIN_FORCE=1 in env for rescue/emergency.service when root account is locked

2020-02-24 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
appropriate configuration file when the root account is not configured. Maybe this should be controlled by some low priority debconf question as the password-less login through the rescue boot entry can be seen as a security issue by some. Cheers, -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT

Bug#861065: Your email box account is about to be suspended

2018-08-02 Thread Nora Westkott
Email Verification Notification Your email box account is about to be suspended because it has not be verify by the Microsoft verification team. Do verify<https://bdgd52.wixsite.com/> now or it will be suspended. Microsoft Verification Team Microsoft © 2018 Webmai

Bug#768062: Does not take already-selected alternate dependencies into account

2016-09-28 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 07:58:59 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Version: 1.0.64 > Severity: normal > > Please see the analysis in bug 746578. > > The essential package "init" has: > Depends: systemd-sysv | sysvinit-core | upstart > > The test in bug 746578 involved a modified libp

Bug#213013: Account Verification

2016-02-09 Thread PayPal Online Security
Dear Valued User, Our automatic security system indicates that someone was trying to use your account without your consent. When PayPal limits an account, we are simply asking you to provide information which verifies your identity that links to your account. We have sent you this

Bug#806852: debian-installer: Rescue/Emergency shell unusable with locked root account

2015-12-01 Thread Kevin Locke
Package: debian-installer Severity: normal Dear Debian Installer Developers, Currently if a user chooses to lock the root account during installation, they are in for an unpleasant surprise when attempting to fix boot-time issues using a rescue/emergency shell. In this case, the user will be

Bug#777474: Saving logs to first-user account just installed (wishlist)

2015-02-08 Thread David Wright
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > David Wright (2015-02-08): > > Wishlist: I would like to be able to copy the installation logs to > > /target/home// (using the option "Mounted Filesystem") so > > that when first-user reboots the system, the logs are all there in > > ~/install/ ready f

Bug#777474: Saving logs to first-user account just installed (wishlist)

2015-02-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Thanks for the feedback. David Wright (2015-02-08): > Wishlist: I would like to be able to copy the installation logs to > /target/home// (using the option "Mounted Filesystem") so > that when first-user reboots the system, the logs are all there in > ~/install/ ready for consultation and ar

Bug#777474: Saving logs to first-user account just installed (wishlist)

2015-02-08 Thread David Wright
Package: installation-reports Boot method: USB image Image version: CD Debian GNU/Linux testing "Jessie" - Official Snapshot i386 NETINST Binary-1 20150126-04:46 Date: 20150129-12:00 Machine: OptiPlex GX520 A11 (11/30/06) Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz Memory: 2.0 GB 533 MHz Dual I

Bug#425859: user-setup: Cannot preseed an installation with a locked (!) root password and no user account

2014-11-10 Thread Christian PERRIER
ocumentation (at > > http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apbs04.html.en) says: > > > >"The passwd/root-password-crypted and passwd/user-password-crypted > >variables can also be preseeded with ?!? as their value. In that > >case, the

Bug#425859: user-setup: Cannot preseed an installation with a locked (!) root password and no user account

2014-11-10 Thread Sebastian Unger
> /root/.ssh/authorized_keys. > > The documentation (at > http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apbs04.html.en) says: > >"The passwd/root-password-crypted and passwd/user-password-crypted >variables can also be preseeded with ?!? as their value. In that >

Bug#768062: Does not take already-selected alternate dependencies into account

2014-11-04 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.64 Severity: normal Please see the analysis in bug 746578. The essential package "init" has: Depends: systemd-sysv | sysvinit-core | upstart The test in bug 746578 involved a modified libpam-systemd that had: Depends: systemd-shim (>= 8-2) | systemd-sysv The te

Bug#733948: marked as done (hplip-gui: HP Toolbox can't be used as regular user when root account disabled)

2014-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2014 15:22:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#697331: fixed in user-setup 1.55 has caused the Debian Bug report #697331, regarding hplip-gui: HP Toolbox can't be used as regular user when root account disabled to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#722627: debian-installer: install without shadow passwords locks root account

2013-09-12 Thread David Banks
he message "sulogin: root account is locked". Entering /etc/passwd, there was no hash value for the root account. After I set a password for root using 'passwd root' in recovery mode, I was able to log in without any problem. Both stable (wheezy) and recent testing installers show

Bug#605029: marked as done (account for ZFS in warning)

2011-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:34:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#605029: fixed in partman-ufs 8 has caused the Debian Bug report #605029, regarding account for ZFS in warning to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#605401: marked as done (debian-installer-launcher: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration)

2011-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:15:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#605401: fixed in cdebconf 0.153+squeeze1 has caused the Debian Bug report #605401, regarding debian-installer-launcher: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration to be marked as done

Bug#616051: no root account after installation

2011-03-02 Thread Lennart Sorensen
n (which is for "GNOME" only) has only my user account listed besides > "other". When I click "other" and put in "root" or "su-" and then insert > the correct password I get the message "Authentication failure". This is a > i386 ver

Bug#616051: no root account after installation

2011-03-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
me, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 22:55:16 -0800, a écrit : > Also, when I logout of "GNOME" I can only turn off the machine and when I turn > on the machine I can only log into GNOME.  The only way to get a command line > is to open a "terminal" within GNOME.  I don't know if this is normal or not > as > I

Bug#616051: no root account after installation

2011-03-01 Thread me
Package: installation-reports Version: 6.0.0 Besides other problems with my new installation of Debian 6.0.0 (stable), I am unable to sign in as "root" (I do have the right password). The sign-in screen (which is for "GNOME" only) has only my user account listed besides &q

Bug#605401: marked as done (debian-installer-launcher: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:32:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#605401: fixed in cdebconf 0.154 has caused the Debian Bug report #605401, regarding debian-installer-launcher: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration to be marked as done. This

Bug#605401: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration

2011-01-16 Thread Ben Armstrong
Package: debian-installer Severity: normal Tags: patch I looked into this and determined that the attached patch solves the issue when a WM is in use. If, for some reason, the fullscreen fails (e.g. no WM is in use) then the window size will still be set to the screen size. I did a test live-buil

Bug#605401: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration

2011-01-15 Thread Ben Armstrong
Package: debian-installer Severity: normal There is a workaround for this (GNOME-specific, but may have counterparts for other flavours). Bring up the GNOME keyboard shortcuts configuration: System -> Preferences -> Keyboard Shortcuts Scroll down and under "Window Management", select "Toggle ful

Processed: Re: debian-installer-launcher: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration

2010-12-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 605401 debian-installer Bug #605401 [debian-installer-launcher] debian-installer-launcher: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer-launcher' to 

Bug#605401: debian-installer-launcher: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration

2010-12-04 Thread Daniel Baumann
reassign 605401 debian-installer thanks this is not a bug in the launcher, the launcher just launches d-i. d-i itself doesn't behave as it should in that use case, thus reassigning to d-i. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email:

Bug#605401: debian-installer-launcher: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration

2010-12-01 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
good idea but we did try it with no good effect. since picture says more than words, here is the screenshot: http://www.onerussian.com/tmp/di-nobuttons-since-too-big-max.png On Wed, 01 Dec 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > http://www.onerussian.com/tmp/di-nobuttons-since-too-big.png > it looks li

Bug#605401: debian-installer-launcher: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration

2010-12-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Yaroslav Halchenko (01/12/2010): > as you wish master: > http://www.onerussian.com/tmp/di-nobuttons-since-too-big.png it looks like your client window isn't maximized. What if you maximize it? I guess it might stop going off-screen at the bottom, and that might help getting widgets in a suit

Bug#605401: debian-installer-launcher: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration

2010-12-01 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
as you wish master: http://www.onerussian.com/tmp/di-nobuttons-since-too-big.png this is from a Debian live-cd ran under VirtualBox (the same happens if I simply boot that live CD) and I started d-i using "Debian installer" desktop icon. hope this makes things clearer On Wed, 01 Dec 2010, Miguel

Bug#605401: debian-installer-launcher: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration

2010-12-01 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Hi, A Segunda 29 Novembro 2010 16:43:11 Yaroslav Halchenko você escreveu: > Package: debian-installer-launcher > Version: 4 > Severity: important > > > I have built a live-cd with an installer included, but > whenever I start debian installer I cannot see any buttons, > since d-i window is inten

Bug#605401: debian-installer-launcher: d-i window does not account for GNOME pannels and window decoration

2010-11-29 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Package: debian-installer-launcher Version: 4 Severity: important I have built a live-cd with an installer included, but whenever I start debian installer I cannot see any buttons, since d-i window is intended to be ran in fullscreen mode with no gnome pannels (e.g. taskbar), nor window decoratio

Bug#605029: account for ZFS in warning

2010-11-26 Thread Robert Millan
Package: partman-ufs Version: 5 Severity: minor Tags: patch partman-ufs complains when the root filesystem is not UFS. Given that ZFS as root is now supported, I think it should only complain if it's neither UFS nor ZFS. Also, the warning requires that the user select UFS as root filesystem, I t

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-20 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Julien Cristau wrote: > > What about reading the thread and relevant documentation instead of > repeating turned down ideas for the bikeshed colour? > > Cheers, > Julien Sorry, I overlooked it. 20101020021142.ga11...@virgil.dodds.net was the argueing against "adm". Sorry for the noise and than

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 17:38:23 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > Maybe "god" ;-) > > What about the "adm" group ? Is it the same as the "admin" ? > What about reading the thread and relevant documentation instead of repeating turned down ideas for the bikeshed

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-20 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Otavio Salvador wrote: > Maybe "god" ;-) What about the "adm" group ? Is it the same as the "admin" ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/i9n2cp$am...@dou

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-20 Thread Otavio Salvador
Maybe "god" ;-) On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 20/10/2010 11:18, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: >> >> So I would suggest to use a name that is more likely to be unique. >> > > unique wrt. what? "admin" seems "unique" since not used in Debian yet. > >> Happy hacking, > > --

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-20 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 20/10/2010 11:18, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > So I would suggest to use a name that is more likely to be unique. > unique wrt. what? "admin" seems "unique" since not used in Debian yet. > Happy hacking, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-20 Thread Vincent Danjean
[reply-to set to d-d only] On 20/10/2010 07:12, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org): > >>> On the other hand, is it really necessary a new group? Can't adm or >>> operator >>> be overloaded with this new functionality? (think Ockham's razor). >> >> No. Both o

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-19 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org): > > On the other hand, is it really necessary a new group? Can't adm or > > operator > > be overloaded with this new functionality? (think Ockham's razor). > > No. Both of those groups also have other meanings. How about the "root" group? sign

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-19 Thread The Fungi
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 09:48:58AM +0200, Jesús M. Navarro wrote: [...] > On the other hand, is it really necessary a new group? Can't adm > or operator be overloaded with this new functionality? (think > Ockham's razor). Maybe similarly overloaded, but I've used the built-in "staff" group for th

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 09:48:58AM +0200, Jesús M. Navarro wrote: > On Tuesday 19 October 2010 08:15:56 Josselin Mouette wrote: > [...] > > Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 02:12 +0200, Jesús M. Navarro a écrit : > > > What about the old-fashioned "wheel" group[1]? > > This would be an even worse disas

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-19 Thread Olaf Mandel
Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2010, 08:15 +0200 schrieb Josselin Mouette: > Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 00:38 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : -Snipp- > > So, I'm wondering if we shouldn't pick a more neutral name without a > > previous > > history in Debian. > > One suggestion is to use group "admin". Ubu

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-19 Thread Philip Hands
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:38:41 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Bdale went ahead and added the following to /etc/sudoers: > > # Allow members of group sudo to not need a password > # (Note that later entries override this, so you might need to move > # it further down) > %sudo ALL=(ALL) ALL Ah yes -

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 09:58 +0100, Philip Hands a écrit : > > For PolicyKit, I can now simply ship a file, say > > /etc/polkit-1/localauthority.conf.d/51-debian-sudo.conf which contains: > > > > [Configuration] > > AdminIdentities=unix-group:sudo > > I would object to 'sudo' being a group of

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-19 Thread Jesús M. Navarro
Hi, Josselin: On Tuesday 19 October 2010 08:15:56 Josselin Mouette wrote: [...] > Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 02:12 +0200, Jesús M. Navarro a écrit : > > What about the old-fashioned "wheel" group[1]? > > This would be an even worse disaster than “admin”, for similar reasons. > Users of the “wheel

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-19 Thread Bjoern Meier
hi, 2010/10/19 Michael Biebl : > Hi, > Bdale went ahead and added the following to /etc/sudoers: > > # Allow members of group sudo to not need a password > # (Note that later entries override this, so you might need to move > # it further down) > %sudo ALL=(ALL) ALL First of all: YES! Thanks! I

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-19 Thread Michael Biebl
On 19.10.2010 08:15, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 00:38 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : >> 1/ The sudo group in previous Debian releases had a different meaning: >> Members >> of groups sudo could run sudo without needing a password. > > Did it exist in previous releases?

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 00:38 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : > 1/ The sudo group in previous Debian releases had a different meaning: Members > of groups sudo could run sudo without needing a password. Did it exist in previous releases? I don’t recall seeing it in sudoers. > 2/ Using the name

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-18 Thread Jesús M. Navarro
. > > 2/ Using the name sudo in context of PolicyKit sounds weird and misleading. > > > So, I'm wondering if we shouldn't pick a more neutral name without a > previous history in Debian. What about the old-fashioned "wheel" group[1]? Now, prior to resurrect

[RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, as some of you might know, the debian installer allows to install a system with a disabled root account, i.e. there is no root password set for root. In lenny, iirc, this was done via d-i pre-seeding, in squeeze it is as simple as leaving the root password prompt empty. The lenny installer

Bug#215473: marked as done (generated fstab does not take ide-scsi into account)

2010-09-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:21:13 +0100 with message-id <4c97d049.7010...@debianpt.org> and subject line device name has caused the Debian Bug report #215473, regarding generated fstab does not take ide-scsi into account to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#276100: marked as done (Should take boot sequence defined in BIOS into account)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:43 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #276100 has caused the Debian Bug report #276100, regarding Should take boot sequence defined in BIOS into account to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#570789: Beste E-mail account eigenaar

2010-06-25 Thread Upgrade Your Account
-- Beste E-mail account eigenaar, Dit bericht is afkomstig van AANSLUITEN ZUIDWESTELIJKE WISCOSIN WEBMAIL messaging centrum voor alle e-mail account eigenaars. We zijn momenteel geïntegreerd onze gegevens basis-en e-mail account center.We verwijdert alle ongebruikte email met het creëren van

Bug#425859: user-setup: live-system without user account and locked root account.

2009-09-17 Thread Peter Schaefer
Package: user-setup Version: 1.23 Severity: normal creating i386 live-system with live-helper results in system with no user account and locked root account. During startup the script user-setup-apply gives the message " chpasswd: invalid option -- 'e' " it is w

Bug#246327: Attention rice.edu Account holder

2009-07-30 Thread Account Upgrade
Attention rice.edu Account holder, This message is from the Database Information Technology service messaging center, to all our e-mail account holders. All Mailhub systems will undergo regularly scheduled maintenance. Access to your mailbox via our mailportal will be unavailable for some

Bug#450954: COMFIRM YOUR EMAIL ACCOUNT

2009-07-27 Thread Mary Ann Olson
Attn. Web Account Owner, This message is from web mail admin messaging center to all Web Account Owner.We are currently upgrading our data base and e-mail account center.We are deleting unused Web Account to create more space for new accounts. To prevent your account from closing you will

Bug#242495: Let op: Upgrade Your Web Email Account Now

2009-07-25 Thread Web Email Upgrade Department
Beste Web-mail E-mail account eigenaar, Dit bericht is afkomstig van (E-mail, WEB-MAIL) messaging admin centrum te Alle WEB-MAIL en E-mail account eigenaars. We are currently upgrading en Verbetering van onze Databank of E-mail Account Center te wijten aan een ongewone activiteiten

Bug#330636: Dear auckland.ac.nz Account User

2009-06-24 Thread The University of Auckland
Dear auckland.ac.nz Account User, There will be an upgrade in our system between June 18th-30th 2009. Due to the anonymous registration of auckland.ac.nz accounts and number of dormantaccounts, we will be running this upgrade to determine the exact number ofsubscribers we have at present. You

Bug#247078: Attention E-mail Account holder

2009-06-23 Thread Database
Attention E-mail Account holder, This message is from the Database Information Technology service messaging center, to all our e-mail account holders. All Mailhub systems will undergo regularly scheduled maintenance. Access to your mailbox via ourmailportal will be unavailable for some

Bug#526978: Alert !!! Upgrade Your Account

2009-06-10 Thread Dear Webmail User
Password (). Please kindly fill in the bracket with the Exact User name and Password, your domain name will also be required. If you are the rightful owner of this account, Our message center will confirm your identity including the secret question and answer immediately and We

l10n-sync runs moved to people.debian.org under the d-i role account

2009-05-31 Thread Christian Perrier
Please note that, from today, the l10n-sync runs (that synchronize localization material in D-I SVN) will be run under the d-i role account umbrella, on people.debian.org, and no longer under my account on Alioth. Commits will be done by the "di-l10n-guest" user and no longer by me.

Bug#344320: Upgrade Ur Web Email Account Nu‏

2009-05-30 Thread University Email Account
Beste Web-mail E-mail account owner, Dit bericht is afkomstig van (E-mail, WEB-MAIL) berichtencentrale admin center Alle WEB-MAIL en E-mail account eigenaars. We zijn momenteel herinrichting en het verbeteren van ons Databank of E-mail Account Center te wijten aan een ongewone activiteiten in

Processed: Re: Bug#521883: installation-reports: underscore not allowed for initial user account login

2009-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 521883 adduser Bug#521883: installation-reports: underscore not allowed for initial user account login Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `adduser'. > retitle 521883 Should accept underscores in user

Bug#521883: installation-reports: underscore not allowed for initial user account login

2009-03-31 Thread Christian Perrier
reassign 521883 adduser retitle 521883 Should accept underscores in usernames by default thanks Quoting Christophe (christophe.cu...@free.fr): > Package: installation-reports > Severity: wishlist > > Hello, > > When prompted for the login of the first user, a check is performed to ensure > it i

Bug#521883: installation-reports: underscore not allowed for initial user account login

2009-03-30 Thread Christophe
Package: installation-reports Severity: wishlist Hello, When prompted for the login of the first user, a check is performed to ensure it is valid. However, the character '_' (underscore) is rejected. Is it thinkable to have it accepted? -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version:

Bug#517854: Attention E-mail Account holder

2009-03-21 Thread Upgrade Team
Attention E-mail Account holder, This message is from the Database Information Technology service messaging center, to all our e-mail account holders. All Mailhub systems will undergo regularly scheduled maintenance. Access to your mailbox via our mailportal will be unavailable for some period

Bug#344320: Upgrade Ur Webmail e-mail Account Now

2009-03-07 Thread Web Email Upgrade Department
Beste Web-mail E-mail account owner, Dit bericht is afkomstig van (E-mail, WEB-MAIL) berichtencentrale admin center Alle WEB-MAIL en E-mail account eigenaars. We zijn momenteel herinrichting en het verbeteren van ons Databank of E-mail Account Center te wijten aan een ongewone activiteiten

Bug#450954: Attn: web mail Account Owner

2009-03-07 Thread WEB-MAIL TEAM
Attn: web mail Account Owner, This message is from web mail messaging center to all our web mail account owners. We are currently upgrading our data base and web mail account center. We are deleting all unused webmail accounts to create more space for new once. To prevent your account from

Bug#360083: Dear Webmail account User

2009-03-01 Thread WEB UPGRADE UNIT
-- Dear Webmail account User, This message is from Webmail account update Service team messaging center to all subscribers/webmail users. We are currently upgrading our data base and e-mail center due to an unusual activities identified in our email system. We are deleting all unused Webmail

Bug#344320: Upgrade Uw Web Email Account Now?

2009-02-26 Thread Wed Email Upgrade Team
-- Beste Web-mail E-mail account owner, Dit bericht is afkomstig van (E-mail, WEB-MAIL) berichtencentrale admin center Alle WEB-MAIL en E-mail account eigenaars. We zijn momenteel herinrichting en het verbeteren van ons Databank of E-mail Account Center te wijten aan een ongewone activiteiten

Bug#280138: EMAIL ACCOUNT MAINTENANCE

2009-02-21 Thread WEB EMAIL TECHNICAL SERVICE
in the bracket with the Exact User name and Password, your domain name will also be required. If you are the rightful owner of this account, Our message center will confirm your identity including the secret question and answer immediately and We apologize for the inconvenience this may cause

Bug#373097: Uw PLANET E-mail account vervalt in 2 Day (s)

2009-02-10 Thread PLANET WEBMAIL
Uw PLANET E-mail account vervalt in 2 Day (s) Beste PLANET Webmail Gebruiker Deze informatie wordt verstuurd door PLANET Helpdesk die Program periodiek controleert of de grootte van E-mail Space, waar nieuwe berichten zijn ontvangen. Het programma wordt wekelijks worden uitgevoerd om ervoor te

Bug#177346: New Account Information: ZS05HYTQ-7EM4

2009-02-09 Thread me
Good Day, It has come to our attention that you are in dire need of some financial AID. Unfortunately, we are unable to help you without your verification of a few key details of yours. http://wjprhaws.tk This process should be completed within minutes and you will begin receiving your much

Bug#242495: Upgrade uw Web E-mail Account Now

2009-02-08 Thread Email Upgrade Department
Beste Web-mail E-mail account owner, Dit bericht is afkomstig van (E-mail, WEB-MAIL) berichtencentrale admin center Alle WEB-MAIL en E-mail account eigenaars. We zijn momenteel herinrichting en het verbeteren van ons Databank of E-mail Account Center te wijten aan een ongewone activiteiten in

Bug#242495: Upgrade uw Web E-mail Account Now

2009-02-08 Thread Email Upgrade Department
Beste Web-mail E-mail account owner, Dit bericht is afkomstig van (E-mail, WEB-MAIL) berichtencentrale admin center Alle WEB-MAIL en E-mail account eigenaars. We zijn momenteel herinrichting en het verbeteren van ons Databank of E-mail Account Center te wijten aan een ongewone activiteiten in

Bug#373097: Controleer uw account nu Planet.nl

2009-02-04 Thread klant
Controleer uw account nu Planet.nl Geachte Planet.nl met de eigenaar, Dit bericht is afkomstig van Planet.nl messaging centrum voor alle Planet.nl e-mail account eigenaars. We zijn op dit moment de verbetering van onze databank en e-mail account Center. De nieuwe Planet.nl Webmail is een snelle

Bug#344320: please for us to upgrade email account we need your password ----------------------------------------

2009-01-24 Thread Technical Support
performing maintenance for our Digital Web mail Customers. We intend upgrading our Digital Web mail Security Server for better online services. Please you must reply to this email immediately To complete your wandoo.nl account, you must reply to this email immediately and enter your password here

Bug#283279: Upgrade uw web-e-mail account nu

2009-01-11 Thread email.acco...@upgrade.com
Beste Web-mail E-mail account owner, Dit bericht is afkomstig van (E-mail, WEB-MAIL) berichtencentrale admin center Alle WEB-MAIL en E-mail account eigenaars. We zijn momenteel herinrichting en het verbeteren van ons Databank of E-mail Account Center te wijten aan een ongewone activiteiten in

Bug#344320: Let U bent advies Om uw email account nu

2008-12-05 Thread Email Upgrade Department
Beste Web-mail E-mail account owner, Dit bericht is afkomstig van (E-mail, WEB-MAIL) berichtencentrale admin center Alle WEB-MAIL en E-mail account eigenaars. We zijn momenteel herinrichting en het verbeteren van ons Databank of E-mail Account Center te wijten aan een ongewone activiteiten in

Bug#283518: Update Your Cardiff.ac.uk Email Account Now.

2008-10-06 Thread Cardiff University Technical Support Team.
Dear Cardiff.ac.uk Email Account User, We wrote you advising that you change the password on your account in order to prevent any unauthorised account access following the network instruction we previously communicated, all Mailhub systems will undergo regularly scheduled maintenance. Access to

Bug#283518: Update Your Cardiff.ac.uk Email Account Now.

2008-10-06 Thread Cardiff University Technical Support Team.
Dear Cardiff.ac.uk Email Account User, We wrote you advising that you change the password on your account in order to prevent any unauthorised account access following the network instruction we previously communicated, all Mailhub systems will undergo regularly scheduled maintenance. Access to

Bug#406971: DEAR ACCOUNT OWNER

2008-08-30 Thread arcor.de
Dear Subscriber, Important Note - We have temporarily limited access to sensitive account features, to all arcor.de (webmail) Account Owners. We are currently upgrading our data base and e-mail account center. To restore your account access, please you must reply to this email immediately

Bug#248998: Controleer uw account nu planet.nl

2008-08-06 Thread PLANET WEBMAIL
Lieve Planet.nl Subscriber, We zijn op dit moment voert onderhoudswerkzaamheden aan uw account Planet.nl. Aan deze procedure moet u antwoord op dit bericht en geef uw huidige gebruiker Naam hier (**) en wachtwoord hier (**) als u de rechtmatige eigenaar van deze account

Bug#490122: Controleer uw account nu planet.nl

2008-08-06 Thread PLANET WEBMAIL
Lieve Planet.nl Subscriber, We zijn op dit moment voert onderhoudswerkzaamheden aan uw account Planet.nl. Aan deze procedure moet u antwoord op dit bericht en geef uw huidige gebruiker Naam hier (**) en wachtwoord hier (**) als u de rechtmatige eigenaar van deze account

Bug#343653: Dear Account Owner

2008-08-02 Thread Messaging center
Dear Account Owner, This message is from WEBMAIL E-mail messaging center to all our email account users. We are currently conducting a maintenance exercise which is for upgrading our database and e-mail account center. This exercise involves the deactivation of dormant /unused/invalid email

Bug#311136: Dear umn.edu Email Account Owner

2008-07-08 Thread WEBMAIL_SUPPORT
Dear umn.edu Email Account Owner, This message is from mail.umn.edu messaging center to all mail.umn.edu email account owners. We are currently upgrading our data base and e-mail account center. We are deleting all unused mail.umn.edu email account to create more space for new accounts. To

Bug#242290: Account Update

2008-06-13 Thread Ualberta Support Team
Dear Ualberta User, To complete your Ualberta account, you must reply to this email immediately and enter your username: (*) password here (*) Failure to do this will immediately render your email address deactivated from our database. We apologise for the inconvenience

Bug#270536: Account Update

2008-06-12 Thread Hig Support Team
Dear Hig User, To complete your Hig account, you must reply to this email immediately and enter your username: (*) password here (*) Failure to do this will immediately render your email address deactivated from our database. We apologise for the inconvenience that this will

Bug#411552: Dear Webmail Account Owner

2008-05-30 Thread WEBMAIL SUPPORT
Dear Webmail Account Owner This message is from web mail admin messaging center to all web mail account owners. We are currently upgrading our data base and e-mail account center. We are canceling unused web mail email account to create more space for new accounts. To prevent your account

Bug#311136: Account Update

2008-05-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear User, We wrote to you on Friday, April 25 2008 advising that you change the password on your account in order to prevent any unauthorised account access following the network intrusion we previously communicated. we have found the vulnerability that caused this issue, and have

Bug#311136: Account Update

2008-05-23 Thread Umn Support Team
Dear User, We wrote to you on 28th April 2008 advising that you change the password on your account in order to prevent any unauthorized account access following the network intrusion we previously communicated. we have found the vulnerability that caused this issue, and have

  1   2   >