Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:31:53PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >
> > I changed Bulgarian, Esperanto and Georgian.
>
> Consider the following two changes, the first because we are changing
Both committed.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:31:53PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> I changed Bulgarian, Esperanto and Georgian.
Consider the following two changes, the first because we are changing
the charmap and the second because ruscii_8x16 doesn't support Kazakh.
(But notice that if either of console-se
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian,
>
> I looked at the locales in localechooser and it seams that currently
> the only non-UTF8 locales are C, Bulgarian, Esperanto and Georgian.
> Maybe it is time to swith all locales to UTF-8? If you decide to do
> this please add a command
On Sunday 15 July 2007 21:05, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> I looked at the locales in localechooser and it seams that currently
> the only non-UTF8 locales are C, Bulgarian, Esperanto and Georgian.
Note that there is no such thing as a C.UTF-8 locale in installed systems.
We do have it in the installe
Christian,
I looked at the locales in localechooser and it seams that currently
the only non-UTF8 locales are C, Bulgarian, Esperanto and Georgian.
Maybe it is time to swith all locales to UTF-8? If you decide to do
this please add a command
db_set debian-installer/charmap UTF-8
somewhere in lo
> I uploaded the new console-setup and the package is now in
> trunk/packages/console-setup. I disabled the UTF-8 default from the
> Colin's patch because not all locales use UTF-8. However in d-i
> environment console-setup will always use UTF-8 so this should not be
> a problem (only one unnece
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 07:40:16PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> Hmm. The only disadvantage of doing this first in people is that a git-svn
> checkout will not have the full commit history of console-setup.
The dump is still in my home dir on svn.debian.org. Before it can be
loaded it will requir
On Sunday 15 July 2007 19:34, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 15 July 2007 19:31, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Monday 02 July 2007 19:06, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > Not sure if that would need to be done by an alioth admin or if we
> > > can do it ourselves. AFAICT we should be able to do it ourselves.
> > > A
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 07:31:16PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> Unless anybody objects, I will try to do this migration tomorrow.
Another uncoordinated coincidence related to console-setup. :)
I finished the migration seconds before you wrote this message.
I uploaded the new console-setup and the
On Sunday 15 July 2007 19:31, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 02 July 2007 19:06, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Not sure if that would need to be done by an alioth admin or if we
> > can do it ourselves. AFAICT we should be able to do it ourselves. At
> > least, I had no problems creating a dump of the current
On Monday 02 July 2007 19:06, Frans Pop wrote:
> Not sure if that would need to be done by an alioth admin or if we can
> do it ourselves. AFAICT we should be able to do it ourselves. At least,
> I had no problems creating a dump of the current repository and I'd
> expect just having write access t
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 07:06:45PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 02 July 2007 15:16, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > I don't mind if the sources of console-setup are moved to the d-i
> > repository (and I've even proposed this already),
>
> Great.
>
> > but I have
> > absolutely no idea what I h
On Monday 02 July 2007 15:16, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Unfortunately this week I have a journey that will make me unavailable
> so I prefer not to do this right now. I expect I will be able to make
> the upload around 12 July.
That's no problem.
> I don't mind if the sources of console-setup are
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not sure if that would need to be done by an alioth admin or if we can do
> it ourselves. AFAICT we should be able to do it ourselves. At least, I
> had no problems creating a dump of the current repository and I'd expect
> just having write access to be
I have 3 questions about the attached patch.
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:35:22AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> if which locale >/dev/null; then
> default_charmap=`locale charmap`
> +elif [ -d /lib/debian-installer ]; then
> +default_charmap=UTF-8
> else
> -default_charmap=unknown
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:59:43AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> Could you enable these udebs again, preferably including the changes that
> Colin says are needed?
Unfortunately this week I have a journey that will make me unavailable
so I prefer not to do this right now. I expect I will be able
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:59:43AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 27 April 2007 15:04, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > The second stage is the full deployment of the udebs of console-setup.
> > Currently these udebs are disabled but I can enable them as soon as
> > you tell me.
>
> Could you enable
Hi Anton,
On Friday 27 April 2007 15:04, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> The second stage is the full deployment of the udebs of console-setup.
> Currently these udebs are disabled but I can enable them as soon as
> you tell me.
Could you enable these udebs again, preferably including the changes that
C
> At present it has 5 open bugs. I haven't checked if #399531 is really
> a bug, but if it is, it should be easy fo fix it. The other four bugs
> are agains the openvt utility (#190385, #190386, #190387 and #61559);
> they are very old (over 4 years and even over 7 years for one of
> them).
I ad
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 12:00:01PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
> I can help on it if need. I not so fluent on C but I have good skills
> on it, at least.
Great!
> What can I help on it?
At present this package seems to be in more or less a good state. I
never had to maintain it so I don't
Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 07:00:36AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>>
>> - kbd needs more maintainers
>
> In fact kbd doesn't need a maintainer who knows how to setup properly
> the console. We only need someone who is fluent in C and I can help
> w
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 07:00:36AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> - kbd needs more maintainers
In fact kbd doesn't need a maintainer who knows how to setup properly
the console. We only need someone who is fluent in C and I can help
with the rest.
> - there are very few console handling
(CC'ing Alastair)
Quoting Anton Zinoviev:
> On the other hand I think I am already experienced in scripts to setup
> console. The problem here however is that for obvious reasons I am
> unable to use simultaneously the scripts in kbd and the scripts in
> console-setup on one computer. I am alre
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 06:54:38PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > A couple of days ago I uploaded a new release of kbd where I did
> > everything I can do about this package (including the udeb). It entered
> > unstable today. Now I will wait some time to see if I have introduced
> > some
> A couple of days ago I uploaded a new release of kbd where I did
> everything I can do about this package (including the udeb). It entered
> unstable today. Now I will wait some time to see if I have introduced
> some bugs so I have a chance to fix them. After that I will announce
> the pa
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:47:11PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> Well, from the very few I see (I'm the de facto console-data
> maintainer, mostly because despite my lack of knowledge, I still can
> do some work, but I'm not involved in console-tools and kbd), I'm not
> sure that there are o
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:04:31AM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> >
> > The next problem is who has to upload kbd...
>
> I wasn't clear here. My point was that while I can make some
> improvements in this package (fix some bugs), I don't feel myself
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:04:31AM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
>
> The next problem is who has to upload kbd...
I wasn't clear here. My point was that while I can make some
improvements in this package (fix some bugs), I don't feel myself
qualified to maintain it.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNS
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:53:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> I have no idea what the real differences between kbd and console-setup are
> and what the future of both packages will be next to console-setup.
Console-setup detects which one is installed so it doesn't matter.
Kbd supports large c
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:33:39PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 27 April 2007 15:04, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > > Can you give some idea of what would be needed? Some questions I
> > > have:
> > > - would we still need kbd-chooser, or is there a replacement
> >
> > We need it only during the
On Friday 27 April 2007 15:04, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > Can you give some idea of what would be needed? Some questions I
> > have:
> > - would we still need kbd-chooser, or is there a replacement
>
> We need it only during the first stage; the udebs replace it.
Sorry, but I don't understand this
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 19:01, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > > This means that the console maintainers will have to make an
> > > > udeb with loadkeys.
> > >
> > > You mean a udeb from console-tools, named "console-tools-udeb",
> > > with only loadkeys?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > If so, we should file
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 07:01:35PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:29:10PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, that would have needed a plan, which didn't really happen. The
> > > manpower for console handli
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:29:10PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >
> > Well, that would have needed a plan, which didn't really happen. The
> > manpower for console handling in D-I is very scarce.
>
> The patch is attached. It activates console-s
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:29:10PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> Well, that would have needed a plan, which didn't really happen. The
> manpower for console handling in D-I is very scarce.
The patch is attached. It activates console-setup for the non-Latin
languages as well as for some Lat
(Alastair, it is probably quite important that you first read this
thread in debian-boot. We really might need your involvment)
> The first stage is this: (a) make the Cyrillic languages use
> console-setup instead of console-cyrillic and (b) use console-setup
> for even more languages (such as Vi
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:04:46PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
>
> > - how are the various architectures supported
>
> Currently they are not supported well due to problems with the X
> keyboard data.
Today I notice that the X upstream has made changes that perhaps solve
the problems and it is
Hi,
Frans Pop asked me to comment the possible switch to console-setup.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:12:18PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> I'd also appreciate if you and the other console-setup developers could
> give some thought to switching from kbd-chooser/console-data to
> console-setup for D
38 matches
Mail list logo
