Re: A serious problem with partman/parted [was: D-I impressions]

2004-08-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 08:16:47AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Anton Zinoviev] > > I browsed the archives of the mailing list of parted and discovered that > > this is a known bug of parted. There were even flame wars about it. > > This is going to be quiet unfortunate to many people who

Re: A serious problem with partman/parted [was: D-I impressions]

2004-08-08 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Anton Zinoviev] > I browsed the archives of the mailing list of parted and discovered that > this is a known bug of parted. There were even flame wars about it. > This is going to be quiet unfortunate to many people who will try to > install Debian on dual-boot systems (#258880). Is is all this

Re: A serious problem with partman/parted [was: D-I impressions]

2004-08-08 Thread my
"Anton Zinoviev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ryan Underwood wrote: > > partition table appears to be created with a xxx/64/63 geometry by the > > partitioner. I'm not sure why this is done. Most SCSI disks I can > > remember partitioning would have a xxx/255/63

A serious problem with partman/parted [was: D-I impressions]

2004-08-06 Thread Anton Zinoviev
Ryan Underwood wrote: > partition table appears to be created with a xxx/64/63 geometry by the > partitioner. I'm not sure why this is done. Most SCSI disks I can > remember partitioning would have a xxx/255/63 geometry. I browsed the archives of the mailing list of parted and discovered that t