>> Do we have the technology to put more languages on the 2880 disks compared
>> to the 1440 ones?
>
>Hmm, I don't believe so, since it just uses the same root.bin and gets
>split.
That's what I suspected. Oh well.
>Actually the problem with stuffing in languages, I just realized, is
>that we'd
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 03:17:26PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Ok, good enough for me. I've retagged 3.0.18 boot-floppies. Uploading
> source and i386 shortly (will take 2-3 hours).
i have built the i386 from a tagged checkout, you can get the release
directory from:
http://sbih.org/debian
>The following patch installs the MBR to the first existing IDE
>drive, rather than /dev/hda. For systems which have /dev/hda,
>behavior is unchanged. Is this reasonable?
Sounds good to me.
p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 08:32:26PM +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> The LILO stuff needs a bit more thought. The udma100-ext3 situation where
> hde is actually the "primary" IDE interface clearly needs to be made to
> work one way or another. I'm not so sure about the screwball case where
> someone
>Any changes here on in are for 3.0.19. First order of business is the
>'serious' bugs.
As far as I can tell, all the "serious" bugs are port specific in some
way. The serial console problems apparently don't happen on hppa, ia64
or presumably i386. Someone on SPARC or PowerPC needs to confirm
With the -9 newt packages installed, I was able to install base successfully
for the first time in, ooh, ages. Great stuff!
p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo
