Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:42:10PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> >
> > People with such old hardware are probably better of with bo or hamm
> > or potato. They probably need the low-mem target too.
>
> which are not (or will not in potato's case) be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 14:05, Ethan Benson wrote:
> if you don't like that you have two options:
> 2: make your own custom set of boot-floppies.
That is surely what I will do, and have done already.
It bites me a little bit that we don't ship
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:42:10PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>
> People with such old hardware are probably better of with bo or hamm
> or potato. They probably need the low-mem target too.
which are not (or will not in potato's case) be supported with
security updates.
--
Ethan Benson
ht
moving this to -boot exclusivly.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:54:08AM +0100, Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld wrote:
> Hi.
> Although it might sound stupid, my question is:
> Will there ever come a time when making 1220 boot floppies with 2.4.x kernel
> will be doable?
it can probably be done, its just a p
Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi.
> Although it might sound stupid, my question is:
> Will there ever come a time when making 1220 boot floppies with 2.4.x kernel
> will be doable?
> If I assume that it's the kernel size that makes it difficult, then it
> doesn't matter w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Although it might sound stupid, my question is:
Will there ever come a time when making 1220 boot floppies with 2.4.x kernel
will be doable?
If I assume that it's the kernel size that makes it difficult, then it
doesn't matter wether we use boot
6 matches
Mail list logo
