Adam Di Carlo writes:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> I think grub would be better since it's xplatform. I have heard
^
> rumors that its not ready for prime time yet, though.
[snip]
GRUB is quite nice, however, it is not `xp
On Sat Sep 30, 2000 at 01:26:49PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> I think grub would be better since it's xplatform. I have heard
> rumors that its not ready for prime time yet, though.
I've been using it with great results on my laptop, home box, and work box. I
give it two thumbs up (though
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, we can certianly try to do this eventually. However, take a look at
> all the disgusting stuff basedisks.sh has to do in the boot-floppies to
> create a debian base system. A lot of packages need to be cleaned up
> before we can just dpkg -i `cat base-
Taketoshi Sano wrote:
> > * base tarball installer
>
> Is "base tarball" required for woody debian-installer ?
>
> I think if we can use network to retrieve packages, then
> we can use the fresh archive itself, rather than old base
> part of the archive which was frozen into tar-ball.
Yes, we
May I ask some questions ?
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Thu, 28 Sep 2000 18:36:00 -0700,
on the next step, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I picked this configuration because:
> * It's easy to develop for -- it's easy to write a floppy and boot it,
> easing the test cycle.
> * The ha
5 matches
Mail list logo
