On 21/07/2009, Luca Favatella wrote:
> This patch generalizes rootskel code splitting Linux specific stuff.
This is now unuseful.
See also
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i?view=rev&revision=59558
Cheers,
Luca Favatella
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
This patch generalizes rootskel code splitting Linux specific stuff.
As you can read at [0], in the unreleased 1.80 version of rootskel
there is already an entry
* Generalize code splitting Linux specific stuff.
so I think that, if this code is merged before 1.80 release, there
should be no chan
On 17/07/2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Luca,
>
> Please commit it.
>
> It leaves the code much easier to extend, very useful. Go ahead :-)
Committed with a /etc/inittab change, acked by otavio on #debian-boot.
Thanks,
Luca Favatella
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@list
Hello Luca,
Please commit it.
It leaves the code much easier to extend, very useful. Go ahead :-)
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Luca Favatella wrote:
> This patch generalizes code splitting Linux specific stuff.
>
>
> It is not kfreebsd specific, and does not enable building rootskel on
> kf
Quoting Luca Favatella (slacky...@gmail.com):
> This patch generalizes code splitting Linux specific stuff.
>
>
> It is not kfreebsd specific, and does not enable building rootskel on
> kfreebsd.
>
> It should not produce regressions on Linux (even if I didn't test it).
>
> Please note that th
This patch generalizes code splitting Linux specific stuff.
It is not kfreebsd specific, and does not enable building rootskel on kfreebsd.
It should not produce regressions on Linux (even if I didn't test it).
Please note that this is the generic part of the GNU/kFreeBSD rootskel work.
In the
6 matches
Mail list logo