Re: bogl forked (was Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen)

2001-01-29 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 08:54:38PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:27:51PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has th

Re: bogl forked (was Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen)

2001-01-25 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:27:51PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has the same bug. > > > I'd appreciate it if someone on this list would look i

Re: bogl forked (was Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen)

2001-01-25 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:27:51PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has the same bug. > > I'd appreciate it if someone on this list would look into using the > > bogl and bterm in that package, so th

Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen

2001-01-23 Thread Adam Di Carlo
ha shao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A minor bug. > It only effect 32 bpp framebuff which I was using when worked > with bterm. Applied to bf CVS. You should really be given CVS write permission. Do you have this? I can give it to you -- use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] key in the keyring package

bogl forked (was Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen)

2001-01-23 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has the same bug. > I'd appreciate it if someone on this list would look into using the > bogl and bterm in that package, so that we can scrap the one in > debian-boot CVS; having both makes me nerv

Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen

2001-01-18 Thread ha shao
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 05:33:43PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has the same bug. > I'd appreciate it if someone on this list would look into using the > bogl and bterm in that package, so that we can scrap the one in > debian-boot CVS; havi

Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen

2001-01-18 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 11:12:53AM +0800, ha shao wrote: > > Could you please look in to using the bogl-bterm package in the archive > > instead of the included bogl in CVS? It should work fine, although you'll > > have to fiddle a little to do the font reduction. > > > > The same thing. To see

Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen

2001-01-17 Thread ha shao
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 05:17:14PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:10:23PM +0800, ha shao wrote: > >const int intsiz = sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 / b; > > - const int mask = (1 << b) - 1; > > + /* long long is needed for b == 32 */ > > + const int

Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen

2001-01-17 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:10:23PM +0800, ha shao wrote: > A minor bug. > It only effect 32 bpp framebuff which I was using when worked > with bterm. > > > Index: bogl-cfb.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/debian-boot/boot-floppies/utilities

[patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen

2001-01-17 Thread ha shao
A minor bug. It only effect 32 bpp framebuff which I was using when worked with bterm. Index: bogl-cfb.c === RCS file: /cvs/debian-boot/boot-floppies/utilities/bogl/bogl-cfb.c,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 bogl-cfb.c --- b