Loïc Minier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
FYI, Mathias Classen said GTK+ 2.10.4 is going to be presumably released
at the end of this week.
I'm preparing 2.10.4, and it has some bug fixes, but it doesn't seem to
change anything related to DFB.
No, nothing the end
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> FYI, Mathias Classen said GTK+ 2.10.4 is going to be presumably released
> at the end of this week.
I'm preparing 2.10.4, and it has some bug fixes, but it doesn't seem to
change anything related to DFB.
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Hmm, 2.10.3 did build, but I can't claim the directfb flavor isn't
broken.
That's correct: i was trying to say that the DFB backend found in
GTK+ 2.10.3 is broken, while the X backend compiles cor
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Hmm, 2.10.3 did build, but I can't claim the directfb flavor isn't
broken.
That's correct: i was trying to say that the DFB backend found in GTK+
2.10.3 is broken, while the X backend compiles correctly.
Any idea about when
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
1. switch to 2.10.3 libraries
please note that while GTK+ 2.10.2 should compile correctly, current GTK
in cvs ( and 2.10.3 too, IIRC) won't because it needs something like the
attached patch that mike should be applying in d
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> > Hmm, 2.10.3 did build, but I can't claim the directfb flavor isn't
> > broken.
> That's correct: i was trying to say that the DFB backend found in GTK+
> 2.10.3 is broken, while the X backend compiles correctly.
> Any idea about when 2.10.4 is go
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> >1. switch to 2.10.3 libraries
> please note that while GTK+ 2.10.2 should compile correctly, current GTK
> in cvs ( and 2.10.3 too, IIRC) won't because it needs something like the
> attached patch that mike should be applying in days.
> I think
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 09:57:15PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> tag 386860 + pending confirmed upstream
> stop
>
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2006, Davide Viti wrote:
> > the decision has to be made by the gnome team, responsable also of the
> > udebs used with g-i. Don't know if it's going to happen before
Davide Viti wrote:
A bit of history:
a problem [1] with Italic letters near the borders which was fixed
upstream; the fix caused some problems which can be seen in [2] and
was noticed when g-i switched to the 2.8.x set of libraries.
Upstream version of gtk+ is currently 2.10.3, and according to
tag 386860 + pending confirmed upstream
stop
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006, Davide Viti wrote:
> the decision has to be made by the gnome team, responsable also of the
> udebs used with g-i. Don't know if it's going to happen before Etch is
> released
We would really love to; I think it's going to be
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:00:08 +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> 2. revert the patch needed to fix [1]
> this would involve a new upload of gtk+2.0, which should include a patch
> to fix the problem with horizontal/vertical lines.
> I tested and prepared a patch which fixes the problem (see [3])
>
A bit of history:
a problem [1] with Italic letters near the borders which was fixed
upstream; the fix caused some problems which can be seen in [2] and
was noticed when g-i switched to the 2.8.x set of libraries.
Upstream version of gtk+ is currently 2.10.3, and according to Mike
Emmel, upstream
12 matches
Mail list logo
