Re: [directfb-dev] Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 16 février 2009 à 20:49 +0100, Sven Neumann a écrit : > Please note that I can only commit changes to trunk (and then merge them > to the gtk-2-14 branch). There's no point in applying changes to the > gtk-2-12 branch as that branch is obsolete. The patches I pointed to you apply to the 2

Re: [directfb-dev] Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 18:34 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 16 février 2009 à 17:54 +0100, Sven Neumann a écrit : > > I can get your patches into gtk+ SVN if you do the patch review. Just > > point me to bug reports at bugzilla.gnome.org that have patches for > > GTK-DirectFB attache

Re: [directfb-dev] Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 16 février 2009 à 17:54 +0100, Sven Neumann a écrit : > I can get your patches into gtk+ SVN if you do the patch review. Just > point me to bug reports at bugzilla.gnome.org that have patches for > GTK-DirectFB attached that you want to see committed and I will take > care of committing th

Re: [directfb-dev] Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 17:26 +0100, Davide Viti wrote: > So I see the issue, I also see patches floating around (such as > mentioned by Colin Watson e.g.) and I'm also willing to but effort in > this to get it working again. > > Thing is, with the submitted patch, I do not see someone at GTK