Re: [d-i] partkit vs autopartkit

2001-10-21 Thread David Kimdon
At the moment I don't have time to work on partkit. It never actually partitioned anything, by the way, I just got a framework together using libparted. Feel free to use it, or not use it, as you see fit. -David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Re: [d-i] partkit vs autopartkit

2001-10-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 01:06:38PM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait: > 1. Identifying available media, and deciding which to use. > 2. Identifying existing partitions, and deciding what to do with > them (delete them, keep them unchanged, resize them). > 3. Deciding how many pa

Re: [d-i] partkit vs autopartkit

2001-10-20 Thread Joey Hess
Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Anyway there are several tasks (actually my autoparkit do them all > (without asking anything though)) : > - resizing partitions (autopartkit does only resize FAT) > - creating partitions in the free space (that may have be liberated by > the previous resize) > (autopa

Re: [d-i] partkit vs autopartkit

2001-10-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 11:59:35AM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait: > There seems to be quite a lot of overlap between partkit and > autopartkit. I guess the former gives more control, and the latter > figures it all out for you (and can resize fat partitions). So we > probably want both, but for the im

[d-i] partkit vs autopartkit

2001-10-19 Thread Joey Hess
There seems to be quite a lot of overlap between partkit and autopartkit. I guess the former gives more control, and the latter figures it all out for you (and can resize fat partitions). So we probably want both, but for the immediate goal of getting d-i to work, which should we focus on? Overla