Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > "Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Should we add anything special for D-I Guide/Manual? > > I think it's not need. Don't you think it would be nice to have a version of the installation guide in testing and

Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > And, anyway, given that your changes mostly add a feature rather than > > modify an existing one and that we had no report about it to be > > broken. Given also that *you* are well known for goo

Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-16 Thread Otavio Salvador
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And, anyway, given that your changes mostly add a feature rather than > modify an existing one and that we had no report about it to be > broken. Given also that *you* are well known for good testing, I'd vote > for activation. Second that too. Plea

Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-16 Thread Daniel Baumann
Otavio Salvador wrote: > For testing migration we also need the aglomeration packages to be > uploaded. Daniel, when do you plan to upload them? sorry for the late answer.. the modules should be all ready, except the lme part needs an update from waldi. hoping to upload rsn. -- Address:

Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-15 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > It was delayed because I could not upload apt-setup. > I still think they should only be activated after some more people have > actually tried installing from multiple CDs and we know they are OK. > > So: please test! Frankly, given the pretty low level

Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
"Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 11-01-2008 10:33, Otavio Salvador wrote: > [...] >> ,[ Proposed timeline for beta1 release ] >> | Starts at: 2/1/2007 >> | >> | Date What happens >> | 2/1/2007 string freeze starts >> | 2/11/2007 mass upload of transl

Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-15 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11-01-2008 10:33, Otavio Salvador wrote: [...] > ,[ Proposed timeline for beta1 release ] > | Starts at: 2/1/2007 > | > | DateWhat happens > | 2/1/2007string freeze starts > | 2/11/2007 mass upload of translation updates > | 2/11/

Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-15 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 14 January 2008, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > Note that apt-setup currently has some strings that are not yet > > > marked as translatable and that some further string changes will be > > > needed in apt-setup. Not sure if that should be done before or after > > > the Beta. > > > > Righ

Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-15 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > I have personally not done string freezes for Beta releases, basically > > because that is all it is and there is just no necessity to have > > translations at 100%. That said, I doubt it matters very much as it's not > > all that likely there wi

Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-14 Thread Otavio Salvador
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Below are a lot of comments intended to help make this schedule work, not as > criticisms. Thanks! Let's work! > On Friday 11 January 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Bellow goes the proposed timeline. > > It is a bit hard to really comment on this timelin

Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-14 Thread Otavio Salvador
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 06:00:14PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:33:10AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> >> Hel

Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-12 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > > | 2/12/2007 mass migration of udebs > > You should also inform the RMs at some point that all unblocks for udebs > will need explicit D-I RM approval again. You may also need to coordinate or at least keep an eye on some packages that are not strict

Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-12 Thread Frans Pop
Below are a lot of comments intended to help make this schedule work, not as criticisms. On Friday 11 January 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Bellow goes the proposed timeline. It is a bit hard to really comment on this timeline as it does not really contain any info on the work do be done to ma

Re: [RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-12 Thread Otavio Salvador
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:33:10AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hello folks, >> >> I'm starting to get more free time to be able to work on Debian again >> and I'd like to discuss the possibility

[RFC] Possibility for a beta release in Febuary

2008-01-11 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello folks, I'm starting to get more free time to be able to work on Debian again and I'd like to discuss the possibility of we release a beta1 in late Fabuary. Bellow goes the proposed timeline. ,[ Proposed timeline for beta1 release ] | Start