Re: Processed: Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-14 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:09:07AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > tags 430615 + pending > > > > Bug#430615: debootstrap arch:all package installs arch-independent > > files in /usr/l

Re: Processed: Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:09:07AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > tags 430615 + pending > Bug#430615: debootstrap arch:all package installs arch-independent files in > /usr/lib/debootstrap/ instead of /usr/share/debootstrap/ > There wer

Processed: Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 430615 + pending Bug#430615: debootstrap arch:all package installs arch-independent files in /usr/lib/debootstrap/ instead of /usr/share/debootstrap/ There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact m

Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-14 Thread Frans Pop
tags 430615 + pending thanks On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > We could probably make the debootstrap udeb "arch all" by moving > > pkgdetails to base-installer and passing '--arch $(udpkg > > --print-architecture)', but I'm not sure

Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-13 Thread Otavio Salvador
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> debootstrap is modified to include in the udeb only the minimal tarball >> of devices currently also included in the regular debootstrap binary >> package. We still need the udeb to be "arch any" because of the utility >> pkgdetails and because /usr/lib/deb

Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-13 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:52:18PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > One thing that is not completely nice is that bootstrap-base now > > installs a file in /usr/lib/debootstrap/. I thought about putting it > > elsewhere, but think the current location i

Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-13 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:52:18PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Colin Watson wrote: > > +1 also, > > Cool. I've just committed the changes I had prepared (and tested). > I'd very much appreciate a review of these changes. Looks fine to me. > One thing that is not comple

Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-13 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Colin Watson wrote: > > We could probably make the debootstrap udeb "arch all" by moving > > pkgdetails to base-installer and passing '--arch $(udpkg > > --print-architecture)', but I'm not sure that's worth it. > > +1 also, Cool. I've just committed the changes I had

Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-13 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:38:49PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Saturday 10 November 2007, Frans Pop wrote: > > The attached set of patches allow us to no longer need/create the current > > huge set of static devices during installation. Instead /dev from the D-I > > environment is bind mounted to

Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-12 Thread Joey Hess
Frans Pop wrote: > We could probably make the debootstrap udeb "arch all" by moving pkgdetails > to base-installer and passing '--arch $(udpkg --print-architecture)', but > I'm not sure that's worth it. It _would_ be handy if debootstrap could quickly be updated for breakage w/o needing it to be

Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-12 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 10 November 2007, Frans Pop wrote: > The attached set of patches allow us to no longer need/create the current > huge set of static devices during installation. Instead /dev from the D-I > environment is bind mounted to /target/dev after debootstrap has been > run. This has been commit

Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-10 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 11 November 2007, Joey Hess wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > The create_devices function in base-installer has been simplified a lot > > because it no longer actually has to create any device nodes anymore. > > It now takes care of the bind mount to /target/dev and does some > > apt-install

Re: [RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-10 Thread Joey Hess
Frans Pop wrote: > The create_devices function in base-installer has been simplified a lot > because it no longer actually has to create any device nodes anymore. > It now takes care of the bind mount to /target/dev and does some apt-install > calls for RAID, LVM and crypto installs. > (Suggestio

[RFC] No longer create full set of static devices during install

2007-11-09 Thread Frans Pop
The attached set of patches allow us to no longer need/create the current huge set of static devices during installation. Instead /dev from the D-I environment is bind mounted to /target/dev after debootstrap has been run. This also ensures that we will no longer "miss" any devices in /target/de