Re: [RFC] Marking D-I strings for translation priority

2007-11-14 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Saturday 10 November 2007, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > Unless someone actively disagrees, I will start working on marking > > > our 1686 strings as soon as possible (that's quite a huge work),

Re: [RFC] Marking D-I strings for translation priority

2007-11-14 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Saturday 10 November 2007, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Unless someone actively disagrees, I will start working on marking our > > 1686 strings as soon as possible (that's quite a huge work), so plaese > > comment quickly, particularly if you dislike the

Re: [RFC] Marking D-I strings for translation priority

2007-11-14 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 10 November 2007, Christian Perrier wrote: > Unless someone actively disagrees, I will start working on marking our > 1686 strings as soon as possible (that's quite a huge work), so plaese > comment quickly, particularly if you dislike the suggestion. Not sure if it's such a good idea

[RFC] Marking D-I strings for translation priority

2007-11-09 Thread Christian Perrier
(voluntarily breaking threading) From an earlier discussion in -boot, mostly with Frans Pop, the following idea came up: > Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > And the splitting out into sublevels could be done by again first > > > > merging to a single master file and then using msgg