On Sunday 10 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> As you may know, dependencies on glibc udebs are the only category that
> is still incorrect [1]. This is an attempt to fix that.
JFYI.
After some more testing and minor changes in the patch, I have just filed
the BR against glibc to request this:htt
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Symbols files are not used for udebs. So they won't affect dependencies
> > of udebs.
>
> Not that I don't trust you about this, but just to make sure...
>
> Do symbol files affect the way shlibs files are generated, or will those
> remain unchanged?
Th
Hi Raphael,
Thanks for the preemptive response :-)
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > BTW, has anyone looked at how library symbols files interact with
> > > udeb: lines in shlibs files? The symbols file tend to override the
> > > s
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> > BTW, has anyone looked at how library symbols files interact with udeb:
> > lines in shlibs files? The symbols file tend to override the shlibs
> > files, and I wonder if this won't result in bad dependencies in udebs as
> > the libraries they depend on are
On Monday 11 February 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> Since splitting udebs differently than the debs are split is a special
> case that seems likely to affect other libraries than glibc, I'd prefer
> to keep the special case in glibc, rather than in dehelper.
s/likely/unlikely/ I guess. Yes, I thought a
Frans Pop wrote:
> As you may know, dependencies on glibc udebs are the only category that is
> still incorrect [1]. This is an attempt to fix that.
>
> Normally we would add an option '--udeb ' to the dh_makeshlibs
> call in debian/rules. However, in the case of glibc this does not work.
> Reas
On Sunday 10 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> Solution I have come up with is to write a small script that will
> generate the udeb: lines _after_ dh_makeshlibs has generated the basic
> shlibs file.
One thing I'm unsure of is whether or not I was correct in excluding shlibs
files for library pa
As you may know, dependencies on glibc udebs are the only category that is
still incorrect [1]. This is an attempt to fix that.
Normally we would add an option '--udeb ' to the dh_makeshlibs
call in debian/rules. However, in the case of glibc this does not work.
Reason is that two libraries (lib
8 matches
Mail list logo
