Re: [UPDATE][PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build (woody)

2001-04-16 Thread james
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 01:15:52PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Is powerpc buildable yet? Not completely. It got somewhere into release.sh, building documentation, and died. The binary stuff all built for me, though. I'll probably try another build sometime today and see if I can get it to fi

Re: [UPDATE][PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build (woody)

2001-04-15 Thread Adam Di Carlo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I've updated these patches. Please use this version instead > of the original. Applied. > This version fixes some problems in the patches I originally > sent, but they lack build-testing. Thanks to Daniel > Jacobowitz for pointing out most of these problems. (I'm

[UPDATE][PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build (woody)

2001-04-13 Thread james
I've updated these patches. Please use this version instead of the original. This version fixes some problems in the patches I originally sent, but they lack build-testing. Thanks to Daniel Jacobowitz for pointing out most of these problems. (I'm sure there are more.) Changelog entries: powe

Re: [PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build

2001-04-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 01:36:52AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hm. It seems that you are right. I noticed the 2.2.18 per se was > missing, ran 'grep-available' to check for other packages, and only > 2.2.17 came up, I don't know why. Going through the lists apt > downloaded by hand reveal

Re: [PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build

2001-04-13 Thread james
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 01:19:08AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I assume you're talking woody here? I've been working on potato boot > floppies for the past week steadily and not had time to look at the > woody set. Yes. > > - config: Changed default powerpc kernel version to 2.2.17. >

Re: [PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build

2001-04-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
I assume you're talking woody here? I've been working on potato boot floppies for the past week steadily and not had time to look at the woody set. On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 01:12:55AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I got a build that ran all the way up to release.sh before failing > to install

Re: [PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build

2001-04-13 Thread james
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 01:15:37AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Braino there -- 'pmac' should be 'powerpc' in powermac.rules. Sorry. ^^^ 'powerpc.rules'. argh. ~~ -- James Deikun, Techie(tm), CSI Multimedia The opinions expressed

Re: [PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build

2001-04-13 Thread james
Braino there -- 'pmac' should be 'powerpc' in powermac.rules. Sorry. -- James Deikun, Techie(tm), CSI Multimedia The opinions expressed &c. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build

2001-04-13 Thread james
I got a build that ran all the way up to release.sh before failing to install some documentation. Here are the relevant patches. I'm not too sure about the second one, because I don't understand what '$system' is supposed to be for (it's currently always passed in as null from the higher-level s