On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 08:33:55PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> There is one doc in ./doc/manual/en that has a broken revision comment.
> I have not checked any of the other languages, but as EN is the 'master'...
>
> Can you fix this?
There is nothing broken, please read the documentation.
Bastian
There is one doc in ./doc/manual/en that has a broken revision comment.
I have not checked any of the other languages, but as EN is the 'master'...
Can you fix this?
TIA.
$ svn diff -r 11579 using-d-i/using-d-i.xml
Index: using-d-i/using-d-i.xml
==
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>> - - I am running Woody, and subversion IS NOT available for Woody. (Oh
>> sure, there is something at backports.org and I'll try and get it from
>> there, but that is not really the Debian way.)
>
> Just build a sa
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> - - I am running Woody, and subversion IS NOT available for Woody. (Oh sure,
> there is something at backports.org and I'll try and get it from there, but
> that is not really the Debian way.)
Just build a sarge chroot to use subversio
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> So, in the end, I still think this could have been communicated better.
The move was intended to be smooth, with a time period during which
both cvs and svn could be used.
However, it appeared that Joshua Kwan tentative for having
synchronisation between
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
First of all, thank you for your reaction.
On Sunday 21 March 2004 14:43, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> This move has been announced a couple of months ago. It has been clear,
> that it will
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> - - The implementation has followed the announcement of intent by less than a
> day, so no time has been given to express views about the move (much less to
> consider the implications).
This move has been announced a couple of mon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 21 March 2004 05:38, Joshua Kwan wrote:
>
> First of all, is anybody strongly opposed to this? Second, if not, when
> would be the best day for everyone for this to be done? It obviously
> puts a crimp in our work because the repository has t
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 01:38:28PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> CVS and SVN $Id$ keywords are different in doc/manual/en/* files, how
> will you handle them?
-
+
The date format is somehow more standard, but I propose to use the
LastChangedRevision keyword.
> Anyway having 2 writeable repositor
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 01:08:40AM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I realized it would be a bit rash to switch over right away, so I've
> snapshotted a local copy of CVS as it stands and I will come up with a way
> to keep both Subversion and CVS in sync for a week. So you may commit to
>
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:05:45AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> GNU Arch would it made easy to avoid a single point of failure
> like one single repostory server.
And is pretty unusable for repositories which this count of different
subprojects.
Bastian
--
There are certain things men must do
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 01:08:40AM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> The amount of time this will exist for depends on how many people still
> continue committing to CVS after the SVN->CVS gateway is complete :)
svn2cvs.pl blocks, I disabled them and locked the cvs repository.
Bastian
--
Knowledge, s
Quoting Joshua Kwan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi all,
>
> I realized it would be a bit rash to switch over right away, so I've
> snapshotted a local copy of CVS as it stands and I will come up with a way
> to keep both Subversion and CVS in sync for a week. So you may commit to
> both CVS and Subvers
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 01:08:40AM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> I realized it would be a bit rash to switch over right away, so I've
> snapshotted a local copy of CVS as it stands and I will come up with a way
> to keep both Subversion and CVS in sync for a week. So you may commit to
> both CVS and
Quoting Joshua Kwan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi all,
>
> I realized it would be a bit rash to switch over right away, so I've
> snapshotted a local copy of CVS as it stands and I will come up with a way
> to keep both Subversion and CVS in sync for a week. So you may commit to
> both CVS and Subvers
Hi all,
I realized it would be a bit rash to switch over right away, so I've
snapshotted a local copy of CVS as it stands and I will come up with a way
to keep both Subversion and CVS in sync for a week. So you may commit to
both CVS and Subversion.
The amount of time this will exist for depends
Quoting Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> GNU Arch would it made easy to avoid a single point of failure
> like one single repostory server.
As far as I have read arch is completely different syntax than CVS or
SVN
A CVS->SVN move has the advantage of not requiring a very important
knwol
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 12:46:02AM -0500, Dan Weber wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 08:38:29PM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Joey and I are interested in converting our CVS repository for
> > debian-installer to a Subversion repository, for more robust work while
> > offline, the
[Joshua Kwan]
> First of all, is anybody strongly opposed to this? Second, if not,
> when would be the best day for everyone for this to be done? It
> obviously puts a crimp in our work because the repository has to be
> locked while the conversion occurs.
Eh, I got lots of work in progress change
Get it over with now. Switch tomorrow!
-- Dan Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 08:38:29PM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Joey and I are interested in converting our CVS repository for
> debian-installer to a Subversion repository, for more robust work while
> offline,
Hi all,
Joey and I are interested in converting our CVS repository for
debian-installer to a Subversion repository, for more robust work while
offline, the all important 'svn st' without the lag of connecting to
alioth, etc. (And just because Subversion is better, so nyah.)
We decided on IRC that
21 matches
Mail list logo
