> On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>>> I did an install with a daily image, suite=etch. It went pretty good,
>>>> but in the e
On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> >> I did an install with a daily image, suite=etch. It went pretty good,
> >> but in the end there are se
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>> I did an install with a daily image, suite=etch. It went pretty good,
>> but in the end there are several differences in the /var/log/*
>> permissions compared to an older Etch sy
Geert Stappers wrote:
> My guess was the d-i package 'rootskel'.
> Checking the facts learnt that it must be somethingelse.
> I could find var/log/messages under debian-installer/packages/rootskel/src/
> but nothing with 'root:adm 640' or 'root:root 644'
rootskel has absolutely nothing to do with
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> I did an install with a daily image, suite=etch. It went pretty good,
> but in the end there are several differences in the /var/log/*
> permissions compared to an older Etch system. For example,
> /var/log/messages used to be root:
Op 15-04-2008 om 11:57 schreef Ferenc Wagner:
> I did an install with a daily image, suite=etch. It went pretty good,
> but in the end there are several differences in the /var/log/*
> permissions compared to an older Etch system. For example,
> /var/log/messages used to be root:
Hi,
I did an install with a daily image, suite=etch. It went pretty good,
but in the end there are several differences in the /var/log/*
permissions compared to an older Etch system. For example,
/var/log/messages used to be root:adm 640, now it's root:root 644.
Where does this change orig
7 matches
Mail list logo
