(No Subject)

Sent using Zoho Mail

Bug#1075714: (no subject)

Small omission... "This reallypromoting the adoption of IPv6!" ^isn't :) Unless of course I've got this completely wrong and there is a way to do both a static IPv4 and a static IPv6 completely through d-i before the system even reboots into Debian for the first time. B

Bug#433568: (no subject)

It's not impossible already to do VLANs with d-i currently (for anyone reading this after a temporary work around until this is properly fixed)... Step 1) Get to the screen where d-i presents you with a list of network interfaces Step 2) Go to VT2 (using alt-F2) and activate the console Step

(No Subject)

Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for iOS

Bug#983494: (no subject)

I've seen this in a fresh virt-manager bookworkm VM, uninstalling arch-test did the trick

Bug#1057145: (no subject)

What command are you using to run debootstrap? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1032530: (no subject)

If that's the case then this is working as intended. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#694886: (no subject)

This is an old one! Does this still occur? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#731859: (no subject)

Working on this, will update soon. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#983494: (no subject)

I've never seen this. Is it fixed? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#940183: (no subject)

This looks like a bug in Fedora, possibly in their implementation of binutils. Can you try again and report back? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#974084: (no subject)

The merge request has a pending question. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#935334: (no subject)

So how, exactly, does this cause an issue? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1061820: (no subject)

Hi, On 2024-01-31 09:15, Ken Sharp wrote: Do I need to submit the patch somewhere else or is this the correct place? the bts is the correct place but debootstrap is maintained by unpaid volunteers like many other open source projects. So getting your patch merged depends on somebody finding

Bug#1061820: (no subject)

Do I need to submit the patch somewhere else or is this the correct place? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#594052: (no subject)

This seems unnecessary for debootstrap. Can this be closed? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1032530: (no subject)

Is /tmp/jammy definitely an empty directory? OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1061820: (no subject)

Okay, okay, I made a real mess of that. Just to clarify: - I mixed up output from Debian and Ubuntu. But the result is the same in both cases. - Turns out I've attached the patch four times. I apologise. I have learned. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1061820: (no subject)

Attached is the patch. It wouldn't attach from the terminal for some reason. diff --git a/functions b/functions index 1924e89..f5de832 100644 --- a/functions +++ b/functions @@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ while (read STDIN, $x, 1) { }' "$@" elif [ "$1" = "GETDEPS" ]; then local pkgdest="$2"; shift;

Re: Bug#1034117: (no subject)

Hi, Andrew M.A. Cater (2023-04-09): > That does depend: if you set up from a DVD with no network, then that > may be the result. If you have a working network, then the installer > should offer you the option to include a network mirror. That's a bug report, so both the submitter and the bug rep

Re: Bug#1034117: (no subject)

On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 08:34:43PM +, Julian Groß wrote: > Turns out that this is an “assumption” problem and not a bug. > > I assumed that the default behaviour would be to set up sources. > Turns out that the default behaviour of the installer is to *not* set up the > sources, but only set u

Bug#1034117: (no subject)

Turns out that this is an “assumption” problem and not a bug. I assumed that the default behaviour would be to set up sources. Turns out that the default behaviour of the installer is to *not* set up the sources, but only set up the installation media as a source. Having the option for that se

Bug#1024720: (No Subject)

Similar issue on system that have already an Ubuntu system installed. Each time I try to boot on an USB key with Debian 11 Iso, I get the grub text prompt straight, nothing else ! If I zap all Ubuntu OS partitions on the existing HD in computer, then the Debian USB key boots normally ;)

Bug#849400: (no subject)

This affects me, too. And it's really weird that it doesn't work, because the live installer (calamares) manages this setup just fine. It's the recommended setup there, actually. -- Niklas (see also bug #858009)

Bug#994743: (no subject)

Just checked Trisquel GNU/Linux behaviour. Installed latest Triskel (KDE variation) in VM, results: $ sudo dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configuration [sudo] password for pioruns: Your console font configuration will be updated the next time your system boots. If you want to update it now, run 'setup

Bug#994743: Info received ((no subject))

This is my discussion about this problem on Debian mail list: https://linux.debian.user.narkive.com/naFOIjLq/colemak-layout-at-boot-time

Bug#994743: (no subject)

This bug is related to two console-setup bug reports: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696773 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696774 -- With kindest regards, Piotr. ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org ⠈⠳⣄

Processed: Re: Bug#990876: (no subject)

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 grub-efi-amd64 Bug #990876 [installation-reports] Installation fails: "Executing 'grub-install dummy' failed." Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'grub-efi-amd64'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #990876 to the same val

Bug#990876: (no subject)

Control: reassign -1 grub-efi-amd64 Hi Julian, On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 09:45:04AM +, Julian Groß wrote: >I just tried installing without changing the default partition table and just >telling the installer to use the whole disk. Also fails on installing grub, but >this time with a slightly di

Bug#926539: (no subject)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351968 suggests looking up the console by major:minor instead of name when using /proc/consoles, would it be possible to have debian-installer do that? At the very least, it'd be nice to have some kind of workaround available, like specifying the consol

Bug#967896: (no subject)

Same issue here on HP Envy x360 cn1002ng with Intel WiFi-AC 9560. Similar to other reports, neither approach of providing different versions of the requested drivers works.

Bug#969518: (no subject)

Gentle ping

[no subject]

To : Debian Install System Team and Debian ALSA Maintainers also Guillem Jover How do I apt-get install the-program(s) name, all seam to say cannot find the add-ons for Firefox application, for Internal Real Time Clock Module for the Raspberry Pi which includes Models A,B,A+,B+,Pi Zero,Pi 2 and Pi

Bug#969515: (no subject)

ping? Patch is a plain bugfix, so I think uncontroversial?

Bug#862500: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Sat, 22 Aug 2020 22:30:56 +0200 with message-id <2020083056.2cba9efdb99ede0f3d2de...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 6 has caused the Debian Bug report #862500, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This

Bug#890404: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Fri, 21 Aug 2020 04:58:02 +0200 with message-id <20200821045802.07acb7c9ded347064600d...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 5 has caused the Debian Bug report #890404, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This

Bug#875788: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Fri, 21 Aug 2020 04:58:02 +0200 with message-id <20200821045802.07acb7c9ded347064600d...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 5 has caused the Debian Bug report #875788, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This

Bug#967918: (no subject)

On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 11:54:49AM +0100, Aperture wrote: >Patch has also been submitted in salsa as: > >https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-efi/-/merge_requests/1 ACK, thanks. Merged now, will do an upload shortly. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st.

Bug#967918: (no subject)

Patch has also been submitted in salsa as: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-efi/-/merge_requests/1

Bug#937735: (no subject)

I can confirm, had the same wrong links yesterday in the non-gui installer of the Debian testing netinst iso You can fix this problem by changing the links to: deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-secu

Bug#833863: (no subject)

Behavior is identical in 10.1. What you could do, without rebooting: open another shell (ctrl-alt f2), luksClose the crypted volume, pgremove the physical volume group, then comes the scary part: add some amnesia to partman. I did a # mv /var/lib/partman/devices/=dev\=nvme0n1 /tmp/, went back to th

Bug#794410: (no subject)

I encountered this issue trying to install Buster on a Gigabyte Brix 2807 - hanging at 11% trying to install 'discover'. Changing the BIOS setting for OS type from Windows 7 to Windows 8 also fixed it for me. Thanks all, Quentin

Bug#833863: (No Subject)

This behaviour remains in Debian 10.0 in Expert Mode.

Bug#879130: (no subject)

This lack of ports mirrors in choose-mirror is still an issue. Just ran into the problem on the sparc64 port. I submitted a merge request for your patch here: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/choose-mirror/merge_requests/1

Bug#879130: (no subject)

> On May 13, 2019, at 9:09 AM, Gregor Riepl wrote: > > This lack of ports mirrors in choose-mirror is still an issue. > Just ran into the problem on the sparc64 port. > > I submitted a merge request for your patch here: > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/choose-mirror/merge_requests/1

Bug#928043: (No Subject)

Evgeny Badin (2019-04-27): > >First guess: Are you trying to use GRUB's cryptodisks support? > > Yes It can't work, sorry; see: https://bugs.debian.org/927165 Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelanc

Bug#928043: (No Subject)

I shot a video https://vimeo.com/332814820 Best regards, Evgeny.

Bug#928043: (No Subject)

>First guess: Are you trying to use GRUB's cryptodisks support? Yes >Second guess: Keymap issues? No Best regards, Evgeny.

Bug#846256: (no subject)

I also experience this bug. I got in touch with the debian maintainers for systemd at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=904079 According to the maintainer, the issue should be solved by using the `After=` directive in the unit file for console-setup. Regards,   Arnaud

Bug#849400: (no subject)

this affects me, too, and is rather frustrating. i welcome warnings and suggestions from software, but this is just plain annoying without a way to override it. i flashed libreboot into my laptop (it's an opensource bios where grub is the payload in the bios flash chip itself). i want to have a fu

Bug#890262: (no subject)

* Arthur [2018-02-21 23:03]: > I now have another problem (should I file another bugs?), openning up These are different issues so please don't follow up here. Let's continue this on the thread on debian-arm: https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2018/02/msg00086.html -- Martin Michlmayr http://

Bug#890404: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports Boot method: microSD Image versions: debian-9.3.0-i386-netinst, debian-9.3.0-i386-xfce-CD-1, debian-live-9.3.0-i386-xfce, debian-testing-i386-netinst (from 14.02) Date: 14.02.18 Machine: Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 10 Processor: Intel Atom Z2760 Memory: 2048 MB Base System

Bug#875788: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports Boot method: Date: Machine: AMD Ryzen 5 1400, 8gb DDR4, 5x 1TB, GeForce GTX 770 2GB, 1250w net aggregat. Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 1400 Memory: 8gb DDR Partitions: Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (plea

Bug#355801: (no subject)

IMO we can close this bug, because this is nowadays implemented (pretty similar) by qemu-debootstrap. -- regards Thomas

Bug#855349: (no subject)

for me an $ apt-get remove kscreensaver kscreensaver-xsavers and $ apt autoremove solved the issue. -- GPG-FPrint: 292B 63BD 0402 DBCC 5026 6F90 AF1A 1478 94F3 7282 old PGP-FPrint: 68B0 853C 8754 F46A 903D 051F EFA1 267B --- I always figured a man was a damn fool if he got up before noon. -

Bug#866629: (no subject)

The CD installer ( https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/ ) is not affected with this bug. I had checked it.

Bug#862500: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, Everything worked fine, apart from the AMD HDMI sound, display is fine but sound doesn't work. -- Package-specific info: Boot method: network Image version: https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-8.8.0-

Bug#857756: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports Boot method: from USB flash drive; written by Rufus Image version:http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/stretch_di_rc2/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-stretch-DI-rc2-amd64-i386-netinst.iso Date: 06.03.2017 Machine: IBM Thinkpad T43 Processor: Intel Pentium M 1.86 Ghz Memory:

Bug#781344: (no subject)

-- Отправлено из Mail.Ru для Android

Bug#781344: (no subject)

-- Отправлено из Mail.Ru для Android

Bug#781344: (no subject)

-- Отправлено из Mail.Ru для Android

Bug#853855: (no subject)

Le 03/02/2017 à 23:55, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Ian Campbell (2017-02-03): >> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 15:51 +0100, Emmanuel Kasper wrote: >>> Actually on further research, net.ifnames and most dot-containing >>> parameters are not here for the kernel, but to configure on boot >>> various systemd

Bug#853855: (no subject)

Ian Campbell (2017-02-03): > On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 15:51 +0100, Emmanuel Kasper wrote: > > Actually on further research, net.ifnames and most dot-containing > > parameters are not here for the kernel, but to configure on boot > > various systemd components, > > d-i doesn't use systemd, does it?

Bug#853855: (no subject)

On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 15:51 +0100, Emmanuel Kasper wrote: > Actually on further research, net.ifnames and most dot-containing > parameters are not here for the kernel, but to configure on boot > various systemd components, d-i doesn't use systemd, does it? Ian.

Bug#853855: (no subject)

Actually on further research, net.ifnames and most dot-containing parameters are not here for the kernel, but to configure on boot various systemd components, the list of which can be found in systemd-232/man/kernel-command-line.xml or online in https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/ke

Bug#845481: (no subject)

I tried again : There is still a black screen with the same message. error: no suitable video mode found. booting in blind mode But the installer obviously starts because, though I get a black screen, there is a fuzzy blurry corrupted 10-pixel wide line on the top of the screen. This line di

Bug#788062: (no subject)

I can confirm this bug for os-prober 1.63ubuntu2. Prober message in host log correlates perfectly with failure in guest log.

Bug#809709: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Sun, 3 Jan 2016 09:18:08 + with message-id <20160103091808.ga12...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#809709: (no subject) has caused the Debian Bug report #809709, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#809709: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports Boot method: Image version: Date: Machine: Processor: Memory: Partitions: Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [ ] Detect network card: [ ] Con

Bug#794410: (no subject)

I encountered this perfectly reproducible exact 12% total freeze bug using a Jessie installer image dating back a few months on an Intel J1900 host with integrated Realtek network hardware - I'm afraid I don't know which Jessie sub-version. However, on the exact same hardware (including the US

Bug#767465: (no subject)

Yes, this happens when installing from a USB drive, the installer mounts it as a cd-rom and it gets added to your sources file, but once your system gets installed the usb drive is never mounted (at least automatically) on the same place, you can solve your problem by editing your /etc/apt/sources

Bug#768188: (no subject)

I've reproduced this bug again with http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie/main/installer-amd64/20150107/images/netboot/debian-installer/amd64/initrd.gz Ingo Wichmann -- Linuxhotel GmbH, Geschäftsführer Dipl.-Ing. Ingo Wichmann HRB 20463 Amtsgericht Essen, UStID DE 814 943 641 Antonienall

Bug#705878: (no subject)

Sorry, I meant "Iceweasel is also installed as default in cinnamon-desktop", NOT "chromium desktop" :-P -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54345e6c.2020.

Bug#759327: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports Boot method: network (PXE with preseeding) Image version: http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/netboot/netboot.tar.gz Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:12:17 +0200 Machine: selfmade PC Processor: AMD Athlon II X2 250 Memory: 2 GiB Partitions: automatic partitioning

Bug#744210: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:47:12 +0300 with message-id <20140412094712.GG1624@sid.nuvreauspam> and subject line Re: Bug#744210: (no subject) has caused the Debian Bug report #744210, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#744210: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports : "Xorg -configure" do not give good graphical screen. Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ine

Bug#740073: (no subject)

Still doesn't work. If only we have a way to install with the older netinstall images (before 18/02), but they all hang just before Grub install (Bug#739682). I can understand bugs in new releases of netinstall, but how come images that worked suddenly crash?! Is there a way we can help to

[no subject]

I'm hoping to get armmp udebs added to the kernel before 3.11 is uploaded (patch posted to debian-kernel but it seems to be lost in the tubes somewhere), at which point I'd like to add an armmp netboot image, per the following patch. The patch is obviously pretty trivial but it is blocked on switch

Bug#690913: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 14:25:50 +0200 with message-id <201308251426.17126.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #690913, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#690166: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 14:25:50 +0200 with message-id <201308251426.17126.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #690166, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#684639: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:42:38 +0200 with message-id <201308251243.25305.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #684639, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

[no subject]

Hi there My name is Alan Hutchinson and I would like to install Debian on a raid 0 system that I have at home , on my home network that I created, I have bean reading up on some of the things that I will need to complete a successful install, for example the raid manager (MDADM) and you also mentio

Bug#718698: (no subject)

if the latest version of os-prober it's able yet to recognize a kernel image on a ReiserFS filesystem you did not have to enter that worrying message in the changelog. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@

Bug#611770: marked as done ((no subject))

Your message dated Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:47:28 +0200 with message-id <201307191247.39152.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line dealing with old installation-reports and d-i related bugs has caused the Debian Bug report #611770, regarding (no subject) to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#660191: (no subject)

Hi! This is a feature I would really love to see. Currently, there is no easy way to use an existing encrypted partition in a new install. You should be able to tell the debian installer which partition is encrypted and provide password to unlock it. You should then be able to use it in your new in

Bug#703404: (no subject)

"> Justification: breaks the whole system No, it doesn't. :-). Hence lowering the severity." Yeah, you're probably right. Even uni-erlangen will update their repo one of these days. And as a result, I would not have a system at all... It would be a miracle when I was able to break a non-exis

Bug#703404: (no subject)

I did not have this busybox problem (actualy an authentication problem) a few days ago, using pxe boot, maybe you installed your host like last week? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org A

Bug#700976: (no subject)

Tags: d-i -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5126ab1e.7090...@axenhus.com

Bug#700974: (no subject)

Tags: d-i -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5126ab15.8010...@axenhus.com

Bug#695500: (no subject)

Hi, On 15/01/13 10:52, Michael Tsang wrote: > Sorry, it still does not boot with the latest image, even after removing > font.pf2. It freezes after 'error: "prefix" is not set'. It freezes on both a > physical machine and a virtual machine. The change is only applied in Git, pending an upload.

Bug#695500: (no subject)

Sorry, it still does not boot with the latest image, even after removing font.pf2. It freezes after 'error: "prefix" is not set'. It freezes on both a physical machine and a virtual machine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Processed: Re: Bug#696124: (no subject)

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 please stop ejecting the installation medium Bug #696124 [installation-reports] (no subject) Changed Bug title to 'please stop ejecting the installation medium' from '(no subject)' > tag -1 wontfix Bug #696124 [installation-rep

Bug#696124: (no subject)

Control: retitle -1 please stop ejecting the installation medium Control: tag -1 wontfix Gordon Graham (16/12/2012): > Subject: installation-reports: The installer, when finished, ejects > the optical disk. This is unhelpful and annoying, especially if you > are installing from an .iso image int

Bug#696123: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm confused. My understanding is that partman was already using external utilities for everything besides fat, hfs, and ext2 resize, and that there were already bug reports covering the lack of progress indication with those. Parted3 appears to have

Bug#696124: (no subject)

Subject: installation-reports: The installer, when finished, ejects the optical disk. This is unhelpful and annoying, especially if you are installing from an .iso image into a virtual machine, and wish to install packages from the disk after the install (and APT sources.list defaults to an ins

Bug#685801: (no subject)

I tried the official debian-wheezy-live-a2-i386-lxde-desktop.img now. But the problem is still the same: it hangs up with a black and white pixeled screen (just like heavy snowfall). In failsafe mode it's the same. Boot option vga=0 has no effect too. Because I can't see anything on the screen I

Bug#692475: (no subject)

Hi, Em 06-11-2012 18:55, Florent Bories escreveu: Hi, I forgot some information. It is inserted in the correct place. The system was correctly installed with the beta3 d-i (regression confirmation?) Best regards, Florent can you send the (gzipped) installation log to document the issue? --

Bug#692475: (no subject)

Hi, I forgot some information. It is inserted in the correct place. The system was correctly installed with the beta3 d-i (regression confirmation?) Best regards, Florent On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Florent Bories wrote: Package: installation-reports Boot method: The installator was

Bug#666750: (no subject)

Geachte klant, De ING spendeert veel aandacht en zorg aan de beveiliging en integriteit van al onze bankrekeningen. Graag vragen wij u dan ook aandacht voor het volgende. Afgelopen jaar is de ING, samen met veel andere Belguim banken, doelwit geworden van grootschalig internetfraude. Daarom zij

Bug#690913: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta3/kfreebsd-amd64/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-b3-kfreebsd-amd64-netinst.iso Date: Fri Oct 19 11:02:24 JST 2012 Machine: QEMU 0.12.1.2 Processor: Xeon X5675 Memory: 2G Partitions: Filesystem

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >