On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 03:09:28 -0700
"Erik Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed Nov 21, 2001 at 08:17:21PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 01:48:16 -0700
> > "Erik Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Good work tracking this down. I'll work up a fix
On Wed Nov 21, 2001 at 08:17:21PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 01:48:16 -0700
> "Erik Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Good work tracking this down. I'll work up a fix
> > and upload a new version ASAP.
> >
>
> I was thinking the same thing, looking at the
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 01:48:16 -0700
"Erik Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good work tracking this down. I'll work up a fix
> and upload a new version ASAP.
>
I was thinking the same thing, looking at the code i found saved some
space savings seperate to this stat issue, i checked it
On Tue Nov 20, 2001 at 11:36:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> According to strace, busybox wc -c reads in the whole file in 4096 byte
> chunks. On the other hand, gnu wc -c just stats the thing, which is
> obviously tons more efficient.
Good work tracking this down. I'll work up a fix
and uplo
Chris Tillman wrote:
> Pkg download approx. md5sum wc -c
> -- --- -- -
> libc6 55 sec15 sec 1 min 19 sec
> dpkg 18 sec5 sec25 sec
>
> I have no idea why the sums and wc take so long on that machine in the
> installer. Must be
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 06:51:10AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 03:40:37PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 10:48:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 07:12:01AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > > > I did submit one, albeit un
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joey, you SHOULD quit this project. You are of no use to it any
> longer, you are publically displaying an absolute intent to force YOUR
> system administration policies down upon ALL of debian's users.
Ethan, I think losing Joey would be a heck of a
> "Ethan" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ethan> Joey, you SHOULD quit this project. [...]
I, too, hope that this bug will be fixed. Hopefully before the next
release of Debian, too.
However, if I was Joey, and I received the previous message, I might
not be so eager to fix
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> Joey, you SHOULD quit this project. You are of no use to it any
> longer, you are publically displaying an absolute intent to force YOUR
> system administration policies down upon ALL of debian's users.
As someone who is not part of this project, you h
Ethan Benson wrote:
> Joey, you SHOULD quit this project.
Could you please take all future flames to an appropriate venue.
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 05:35:56PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
>
> As a junior participant, I may have little authority. But I'd like to
> offer my perception of Ethan: He is hardworking, vitriolic,
> knowledgeable, subject to wide mood swings, and completely committed
> to the cause of free soft
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 12:12:37PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Fourthly, I don't killfile coworkers on projects, because I belive that
> that can lead to disastrous breakdowns in communications. I may,
> however, leave projects in disgust. My disgust level with Ethan is
> currently quite high. Threa
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:40:05AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> I'd submit a patch, but I can't seem to determine where dselect
> asks, nor how base-config can access this information. Does
> anyone know the text of question, so that I can find it in the
> dpkg sources?
ah well, it would be e
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 12:12:37PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> First of all, Othmar's problem report is about an independant bug,
> though it is loosely related to Ethan's wishlist report.
>
> Secondly, I have been away on personal business and have not been able
> to fix all RC (ie, important or a
First of all, Othmar's problem report is about an independant bug,
though it is loosely related to Ethan's wishlist report.
Secondly, I have been away on personal business and have not been able
to fix all RC (ie, important or above) base-config bugs until this
morning. This includes #117741, whi
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:40:05AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 12:51:42AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 08:38:31PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > > > "Ethan" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > Ethan> we are not talking abou
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 12:51:42AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 08:38:31PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > > "Ethan" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Ethan> we are not talking about this, we are talking about
> > Ethan> base-config rm -rf'ing /va
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uh. There doesn't appear to be a patch in the BTS for the 0.1.15.8
> upload. There should be.
Ok, I added it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 03:40:37PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 10:48:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 07:12:01AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > > I did submit one, albeit untested. aj said that particular patch wouldn't
> > > work correctly.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 10:48:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 07:12:01AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > I did submit one, albeit untested. aj said that particular patch wouldn't
> > work correctly. I'm still unconvinced that it doesn't re-download the stuff
> > even w
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 07:12:01AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> I did submit one, albeit untested. aj said that particular patch wouldn't
> work correctly. I'm still unconvinced that it doesn't re-download the stuff
> even when theres a deb sitting there.
So, uh, why don't you *test* it then?
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 08:38:31PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Ethan" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ethan> we are not talking about this, we are talking about
> Ethan> base-config rm -rf'ing /var/cache/apt WITHOUT ASKING.
>
> Hmmm... Maybe I misunderstood something
> "Ethan" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ethan> we are not talking about this, we are talking about
Ethan> base-config rm -rf'ing /var/cache/apt WITHOUT ASKING.
Hmmm... Maybe I misunderstood something, but my impression from the
bug report is that base-config does ask if
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 07:12:01AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 03:44:15PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:53:13PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > > Othmar Pasteka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > just something what everyboday should kn
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 03:44:15PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:53:13PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Othmar Pasteka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > just something what everyboday should know if he/she doesn'T know
> > > it yet, i was bitten by it and i am pisse
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:53:13PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Othmar Pasteka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > just something what everyboday should know if he/she doesn'T know
> > it yet, i was bitten by it and i am pissed :/.
>
> Why not take that anger and turn it constructive energy, like
just something what everyboday should know if he/she doesn'T know
it yet, i was bitten by it and i am pissed :/.
hi,
i just got bitten by this bug and it just pisses me off.
downloading 220 megs and all silently deleted because base-config
configures apt so that it gets the .debs from two differ
27 matches
Mail list logo
