X-Debbugs-CC: Samuel Thibault
Hi,
This looks like bug #879151 in apt-setup - or rather like
a regression caused by a leftover of a previous attempt
to solve it.
Would the patch of [1] be of any help - if some support of
debian-ports architectures in apt-setup is still wanted ?
I hope it wil
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
Le mercredi 19 août à 19h 06mn 39s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> jhcha54008, le mer. 19 août 2020 19:04:30 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Le lundi 17 août à 01h 06mn 05s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > > My debian-cd changes create empty fi
Le lundi 17 août à 10h 17mn 24s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
>
> ... I don't quite understand why "unreleased" is supposed to be part of the
> base installation. "unreleased" is not a regular package archive and all
> packages in there are usually only added temporarily.
>
> Does
Le lundi 17 août à 01h 06mn 05s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>
> My debian-cd changes create empty files so that d-i is happy (exactly
> like is done for -backports).
>
Hi again,
I am just curious : what are the expected benefits
of an 'unreleased' distribution on install cdrom ?
Regard
Le lundi 17 août à 00h 55mn 08s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> What happens when a port does not have any packages in "unreleased"?
>
> ... to dicuss first whether enabling "unreleased" unconditionally will work
> even if a port doesn't have any package in this suite.
Hi again,
I
Le lundi 17 août à 00h 38mn 15s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> This seems to have broken debian-installer on Debian Ports.
>
> Installing the base system now fails with:
>
> Aug 16 22:34:35 debootstrap: /usr/sbin/debootstrap --components=main
> --debian-installer --resol
Hi,
In some circumstances, debootstrap may fail to download
'Packages' files if the option --extra-suite=unreleased is
in use (it doesn't happen with the debian-ports mirrors
but with custom mirrors). It seems that it is caused by
a forgotten 'local' declaration in the patch merged.
In the detail
Le dimanche 2 août à 00h 13mn 59s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> On 8/2/20 12:16 AM, jhcha54008 wrote:
> >>> + is_ports_architecture=$(cat /usr/lib/choose-mirror/port_architecture)
> >> Is there any good reason for this to be a subshell ins
Le vendredi 31 juillet à 13h 15mn 58s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> наб, le ven. 31 juil. 2020 12:50:45 +0200, a ecrit:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:00:26PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > jhcha54008, le mar. 28 juil. 2020 10:39:40 +0200, a ecrit:
> > >
X-Debbugs-CC: Samuel Thibault
Hi,
here is a revised proposal of a patch for this bug report.
It is supposed that the relevant part [2] of the patch proposal [1]
for bug #964248 is applied.
I hope it will help to find a solution.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
[1] : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
Hi,
Here is an updated patch proposal. It is supposed that the
relevant parts [2] of the patch proposal [1] for
bug #964248 are applied.
I hope it will help to find a solution.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
[1] : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964248#52
[2] : Here is an excerpt of t
Hi,
Here is a patch proposal for this bug report. It aims :
- to be compatible with the install CD produced by debian-cd
- to avoid hard-coding a list of architectures in the Debian-Ports repository
- to make the use of the 'unreleased' distribution switchable.
I hope it will help to find a suita
Hi,
Le jeudi 30 juillet à 13h 29mn 40s (+0200), наб a écrit :
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:44:33AM +0200, jhcha54008 wrote:
> > - log "Debian-Ports architecture detected"
> Why is this line removed from the log now?
Oops, you are right,
ctures.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
Le mardi 28 juillet à 12h 51mn 41s (+0200), jhcha54008 a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> In the present state of debian-installer apt-mirror-setup
> creates some non functional entries in /etc/apt/sources.list
> when installing on an architecture from the Debian-Ports
X-Debbug-CC: Samuel Thibault , наб
Hi,
In the present state of debian-installer apt-mirror-setup
creates some non functional entries in /etc/apt/sources.list
when installing on an architecture from the Debian-Ports repository.
Here are the three last lines in my /etc/apt/sources.list :
deb-sr
Hi,
Thank you for your work to improve the installability of port architectures !
Sorry for jumping so late into the discussion of the patch of bug #964248.
I wonder if the versioned dependency of apt-mirror-setting on base-installer
is necessary. Bug #879130 was solved (thank you !), and since
Le vendredi 20 avril à 00h 16mn 13s (+0200), Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>
> IMO the special casing for ports.debian.org architectures should be
> handled in a dedicated wrapper. And maybe debootstrap needs new features
> to make this wrapper possible.
>
Hi,
It would be beneficial to add a new op
Hi again,
It seems that components are duplicated when using option --extra-suite in
debootstrap.
I got the following /etc/apt/sources.list (note the 'main' component repeated
twice or four times)
--8<--/etc/apt/sources.list---8<--
deb http://deb.debi
Hi again,
The proposed patch is not arch-specific.
I tested only for alpha so far - with a
python 3 script 'netabootwrap.py' (attached)
to assemble the netboot image : the build
dependency 'aboot' for alpha is not usable
on amd64. The build dependency check needs to
be switched off altogether
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20190118
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
It would be handy to cross-compile the
debian-installer on amd64 for other architectures.
The patch below aims to suppress some errors
related to build-dependency check and to
packages of a foreign archit
Le vendredi 25 janvier à 12h 46mn 02s (+0100), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a
écrit :
> On 1/24/19 4:53 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > I just never bothered tracking down the problem since I just used the
> > standard
> > installer. If your particular changes makes the installer work on De
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20190118
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ,
debian-al...@lists.debian.org, debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
- The debian installer currently downloads udebs
from the buster/testing suite - which doesn't exi
Le samedi 19 janvier à 07h 48mn 18s (+0100), Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Hi JH,
>
> jhcha54008 (2019-01-17):
> > Package: choose-mirror
> > Version: 2.96
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > Crossbuil
Package: choose-mirror
Version: 2.96
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Crossbuilding choose-mirror with dpkg-buildpackage -a results in an error
at the present time.
It succeeds with the patch below.
Thank you for your work on the debian installer !
Regards,
JH Chatenet
dif
Control: reopen 897379
Hi,
Unfortunately, the patch broke one (admittedly unusual) use case (debootstrap
is not installed as a deb package
on the system) :
# DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR=debootstrap-1.0.101/ debootstrap-1.0.101/debootstrap
--foreign sid mychroot-101
[ ... ]
I: Extracting zlib1g...
# echo $
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.101
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The latest versions of debootstrap may fail on debian stretch if arch-test is
installed.
arch-test version 0.7-1 in stretch doesn't support option -c in use in
debootstrap (>= 1.0.97)
# debootstrap stable mychroot
E: Unable
Hi,
The variable DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR may contain some white spaces
if the option --second-stage-target is given. $DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR
may be surrounded with quotes in second stage too.
I hope it will help !
Regards,
JH Chatenet
diff -Naur a/debootstrap b/debootstrap
--- a/debootstrap 2018-04-17 0
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.97
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
It seems that using the variable DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR may result in some strange
behavior. (/usr/sbin/debootstrap gives an unconditionnal priority to
DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR if set, and /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid not)
Hi,
Thank you for your message and your help to improve the
patch towards the quality standard of Debian.
There are still some questions left on the best way to
package a debian-port support in debootstrap.
Le vendredi 20 avril à 00h 16mn 13s (+0200), Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Wed, 18 Apr
Le mercredi 18 avril à 14h 40mn 35s (+0900), Hideki Yamane a écrit :
> control: tags -1 +pending
>
> On Sat, 27 May 2017 11:27:06 +0200 jhcha54008 wrote:
> > I am testing the updated ([1],[2]) version attached of a
> > debootstrap script to accomodate the peculiarities of n
Le mercredi 18 avril à 14h 40mn 35s (+0900), Hideki Yamane a écrit :
> control: tags -1 +pending
>
> On Sat, 27 May 2017 11:27:06 +0200 jhcha54008 wrote:
> > I am testing the updated ([1],[2]) version attached of a
> > debootstrap script to accomodate the peculiarities of n
Hi again,
I tested (once) in qemu emulation on amd64 two netboot images
built with stretch-backports and the two patches [1] and [2] below (and
#885866 which shouldn't be necessary). The installation
finished successfully (however, it doesn't install automatically
the kernel from stretch-backport
Hi again,
As an illustration of downloading from backports with the rule :
'install the newest version'
here is the source of an (unofficial) udeb : di-sort-packages
It contains a small utility (di_sort_packages) to sort a
'Packages' file by ascending version, and optionally keep
only the newest
Hi,
Just to summarize what I have found about backports support in debian
installer (did I miss something important ?) :
As you pointed out previously, it may be useful to build netboot images
of the debian installer with a newer kernel - and even some newer udebs
from backports.
May I ask if yo
y to 'unstable' because they FTBFS -
modified versions were uploded to 'unreleased'.
Bonne fin d'année à tous !
Regards,
JH Chatenet
Le vendredi 20 octobre à 11h 32mn 29s (+0200), Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> jhcha54008 (2017-10-19):
> > net-ret
Hi,
I realized that bug #885866 just submitted is a duplicate
of #562398 and #801161 - and a special case of #345408
and #345419 (and #389430).
Perhaps it should be merged with #562398 and #801161.
The behavior of anna and the underlying cause in libdebian-installer
were described in details in
Package: libdebian-installer4-udeb
Version: 0.110
Control: affects -1 = anna
Dear Maintainer,
libdebian-installer currently fails when parsing 'Packages' files with
multiple versions of some packages. It results in anna trying to
configure these packages several times and a fatal error.
This err
Package: apt-mirror-setup
Version: 0.129
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: "Helge Deller" , "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz"
, "James Clarke"
Dear Maintainer,
apt-mirror-setup currently doesn't create an entry for the
'unreleased' distribution in the file /etc/apt/sources.list
on non rele
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.171
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: "Helge Deller" , "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz"
, "James Clarke"
Dear Maintainer,
bootstrap-base installs a kernel and some extra packages as its last
steps ('install_kernel' and 'install_extra').
The patch below
Package: net-retriever
Version: 1.44
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: "Helge Deller" , "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz"
, "James Clarke"
Dear Maintainer,
net-retriever pulls udeb packages from one sole suite
(the one registered in mirror/udeb/suite).
Non released architectures from www.
Package: choose-mirror
Version: 2.82
Severity: whishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: "Helge Deller" , "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz"
, "James Clarke"
Dear Maintainer,
The following is a reformulation of a previous bug
report by Helge Deller [1].
The mirror list for non released architectures is emp
Hi,
I am testing the updated ([1],[2]) version attached of a
debootstrap script to accomodate the peculiarities of non
released port architectures from www.debian-ports.org :
- the keyring is debian-ports-archive-keyring (instead of
debian-archive-keyring). This keyring package is
scheduled for
Hi,
It seems that the new version 2.19-3 of fakechroot solved this bug.
$ dpkg -l dbus libdbus-1-3 fakeroot fakechroot debootstrap
||/ Name VersionArchitecture
Description
+++-==-==-==
Hi,
this looks like bug #742070
me@localhost:~$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home/me/mychroot/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu"
fakechroot fakeroot -s .fakeroot.state debootstrap --variant=fakechroot
--include=dbus sid mychroot
[...]
I: Base system installed successfully.
me@localhost:~$ echo $?
0
I get the same pos
Hi,
Here is an updated patch for debootstrap 1.0.78+nmu1.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
diff -Naur a/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid
b/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid
--- a/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid
+++ b/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid
@@ -72,6 +72,10 @@
}
x_feign_instal
Hi,
It seems that setup_devices() was called previously from the end
of first_stage(). It was moved then to the beginning of second_stage()
to solve #498731 and #531316
(see commit d3518b9c7e4f693562d99ec4c15bb009b456603b of debootstrap
version 1.0.34)
As far as I understand, the aim was to cros
Hi,
Moving setup_devices at the end of first_stage()
would solve partially #741964
(debootstrap: --variant=fakechroot and --foreign)
too.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
Hi,
chfn doesn't only give an error in a fakechroot environment, but passwd -
and possibly every PAM invocation - too. The culprit seems to be libaudit1
linked to libpam. I was mistaken blaming a setuid executable.
The symptoms : chfn outputs an error line
chfn: PAM: System error
and there is no
Le samedi 16 mai à 21h 39mn 13s (+0200), Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> jhcha54008 (2015-01-08):
> > Hi,
> >
> > Would the following patch help ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > JH Chatenet
> >
> > diff -Naur a/usr/sbin/debootstrap b/usr/sb
Hi,
bug # 774752 looks similar.
Should it be merged with this bug ?
Regards,
JH Chatenet
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150515185544.GB2941@debirf
Hi,
May I ask if the workaround
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763391#15
helps ?
Regards,
JH Chatenet
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.
Le samedi 21 février à 03h 50mn 23s (+0100), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 02/21/2015 12:24 AM, jhcha54008 wrote:
> > May I ask if debootstrap ran in a fakechroot environment or as real root ?
>
> I haven't tried fakechroot, but the debootstrap call was done using
t out again
> in the future :P
>
> On Fri 2015-02-20 18:24:18 -0500, jhcha54008 wrote:
> > May I ask if debootstrap ran in a fakechroot environment or as real root ?
>
> I'm curious about this too. Adrian, can you give more details?
>
> --dkg
Hi,
I agree th
Le vendredi 20 février à 19h 02mn 31s (+0100), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a
écrit :
> Hi!
>
> I am running into the exact same problem when trying to create a
> unstable chroot using debootstrap on one of our sh4 machines
> using the following command line:
>
> debootstrap --no-check-gpg --includ
Hi,
Would the following patch help ?
Regards,
JH Chatenet
diff -Naur a/usr/sbin/debootstrap b/usr/sbin/debootstrap
--- a/usr/sbin/debootstrap 2015-01-07 23:34:30.439150608 +
+++ b/usr/sbin/debootstrap 2015-01-07 23:54:08.037001814 +
@@ -590,6 +590,8 @@
if [ "$ba
Hi,
May this be bugs #745082 and #763391 ?
Perhaps the workaround at the end of #763391 would work.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian
(+0100), Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> jhcha54008 (2014-12-30):
> > Hi,
> >
> > May this be related to bug #732255 ?
>
> (Adding back everyone to the loop.)
>
> Back to your suggestion in
> <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732255#10>:
>
Hi,
May this be related to bug #732255 ?
Regards,
JH Chatenet
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141230120629.GA2400@debirf-dominicain
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.59
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Using option foreign with the variant fakechroot fails at the second stage with
an error :
$ fakechroot fakeroot -s .fakeroot.state debootstrap --variant=fakechroot
--foreign jessie my_chroot
$ fakechroot fakeroot
Hi,
Would the following patch suffice ?
Thanks for your comments or corrections !
Regards,
JH Chatenet
diff -Naur a/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid
b/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid
--- a/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid 2014-03-13 20:30:32.0 +0100
+++ b/usr/share/debootstrap/scri
Hi,
May the following patch help ?
Thanks for your comments !
Regards,
JH Chatenet
diff -Naur a/usr/sbin/debootstrap b/usr/sbin/debootstrap
--- a/usr/sbin/debootstrap 2014-02-26 20:31:23.0 +0100
+++ b/usr/sbin/debootstrap 2014-02-26 20:32:31.0 +0100
@@ -656,6 +656,7 @@
Dear Maintainer,
Here is an updated script for debootstrap version 1.0.52.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
# /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/debian-ports
SUITE="unstable"
DEF_MIRROR="http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian";
mirror_style release
download_style apt
finddebs_style from-indices
variants - buildd
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.42
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I wonder if we could have debootstrap support the repository
ftp.debian-ports.org.
Please find the script attached as an illustration of the requested
features, in the form of a script
/usr/share/debootstrap/scr
63 matches
Mail list logo
