On May 17, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Aron Xu (2015-05-17):
>> At the moment only spl is available in the archive, using dkms, and
>> for zfs it's similar in the way of packaging though not uploaded yet.
>> What we have (code ready to go) is a mechanism that detects/gets
>> defini
On May 10, 2015, at 9:00 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno, le Sun 10 May 2015 20:51:23 +0200, a écrit :
>> This has some drawbacks:
>
> I see mklibs as a fragile thing indeed.
Seconded.
Since the rumors of ZoL in Debian GNU/Linux stated that there
would "probably", "most likely" (e
On May 7, 2015, at 12:17 PM, Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
> # dpkg --compare-versions 0.6.4-12-0c60cc-wheezy lt 0.6.4-12-0c60cc && echo
> true
> # dpkg --compare-versions 0.6.4-12-0c60cc~wheezy lt 0.6.4-12-0c60cc && echo
> true
> true
I can't use '~' for the separator, because I want/need full sou
On Mar 27, 2015, at 10:25 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> So always use ~wheezy suffix when building for wheezy and use no suffix
> when building for jessie
This used to work, but doesn't seem to any more… I'm at a loss.
wheezy: 0.6.4-1.1-1-wheezy
wheezy-daily: 0.6.4-12-0
On Apr 20, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Philip Hands wrote:
> Turbo Fredriksson writes:
>>
>> Good for you. Maybe it's better now, but my opinion still stands.
>
> Well, that's a jolly constructive attitude, well done.
Not how I meant it, but thanx for misunderstanding
On Apr 19, 2015, at 10:48 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Backports main is official Debian. [1]
You misunderstand the announcement.
… official Debian service …
Notice the last word here! It say "service". Not 'official _PART_ of Debian'!
--
Life sucks and then you die
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Apr 20, 2015, at 7:01 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I really don't think this is a good idea and I'm this close to
> re-close the bug report.
Well, I asked a fair question I think. I knew the answer (but I could
be wrong - I haven't been paying attention to Debian GNU/Linux matters
in years)
On Apr 19, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Did you check if it really was back ports?
Yes. I've been using Debian GNU/Linux since.. 'bo' or something and a DD since
'97 or so. I know what I'm doing (98% of the time :).
> I use backports on all machines I care about, and I never had
On Apr 19, 2015, at 8:25 PM, Geert Stappers wrote:
> What is the danger of having backports (default) enabled?
From what I've seen (when I tried it a couple of years ago), is that
the back porting is quite … "sloppy". If the package needs a newer lib,
that is back ported as well. And the newer li
On Apr 19, 2015, at 7:15 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Paul van der Vlis (2015-04-19):
>
>> Are all machines with backports enabled ticking timebombs?
>> No, but you have to know what you do.
>
> Do you see that “but”? That's exactly why it's not safe to have this
> turned on by default.
Thank
On Apr 18, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Now is certainly *not* the time.
>
> The current pet peeve we're trying to fix is releasing Jessie.
Right, doh! Sorry about, forgot all about that :).
I'll come back as soon as that's released then.
--
You know, boys, a nuclear reactor is
"Some time ago" I created some patches for the debian installer to
provide ZoL support on Linux. Since ZoL wasn't in the Debian GNU/Linux
at the time, the where (of course) rejected.
But now that we have a green light from the lawyers, I think it's
time to get this accepted again.
Because the law
I need libgcc1 in the initrd/installer, but it is in the exceptions file,
so it is not installed.
it say that "it will be pulled in via library reduction". But that doesn't
seem to happen.
Is there something I've missed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Mar 30, 2015, at 6:50 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Meaning ~deb7u1 or +deb7u1 for the first upload to wheezy, ~deb7u2 or
> +deb7u2 for the next one; as for jessie, use ~deb8u1 or +deb8u1 for
> the first upload, etc.
I used to do something like that, but because the 'Dailies' is directly
from
On Mar 27, 2015, at 10:25 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> So always use ~wheezy suffix when building for wheezy and use no suffix
> when building for jessie, and bump the main packaging version up to make
> the new versions higher than they were before.
Awesome, thank you!
> The only unsolvable ca
Since ZoL (ZFS On Linux) isn't yet in Debian GNU/Linux, I've been
doing my own packages for ZoL in that package repo.
This include changes to the installer (debian-installer, base-installer,
grub-installer, partman-target and partman-zfs). But because the Debian
GNU/Linux git repo refuses force pu
On Mar 19, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> AFAICS recent parted versions default to using the "Windows Basic
> data partition" GUID
Isn't that a bug? For those that dual-boot, windows might get … "funny"
with that disk. ?
> For UEFI, adding "write_line esp" helped (commit
> 7ce58763e8
As you may or may not know, I modified partman-zfs to support Linux (ZoL)
a couple of years ago. I've taken up the project again, and got into
a little … 'pickle'.
It _seems_ that when partman creates a GPT partition, it does so using
the 'EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7' GUID ('Windows Basi
This rings a bell.. I though I already fixed that years ago!? Ah, well…
Signed-off-by: Turbo Fredriksson
---
debian/changelog |6 ++
grub-installer |4
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 463efd1..64e59b0 100644
--- a
I'm trying to re-add the ZoL stuff I made a year and a half ago (we're
'expecting'
ZoL to be accepted 'soon' - it's now in the hands of the legal department, we
finally
got the reject we where expecting).
While testing this out (setting up a local, authenticated repo haven't been
easy!),
I not
On May 26, 2013, at 3:31 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Absolutely not acceptable. Out-of-tree modules must not hold up fixes
> to the kernel. It was bad enough when their build failures were
> blocking each other in linux-modules-extra-2.6.
So how much delay would be acceptable? One day? Twelve h
On May 25, 2013, at 10:12 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Please show that CDDL does not impose additional restrictions over
> GPL-2.
Since you seem to have already settled the case once and for
all and are so sure about this, how about you prove your point?
It really doesn't matter who proves ther
On May 25, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
> just use DKMS to build OOT modules at
> image generation time? Seems to be a good idea.
If setting up a kernel-build-system on one of the
Debian GNU/Linux servers isn't an option, then this
would be a second best..
Then it will be up to the user bui
On May 24, 2013, at 8:54 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
>>> What I can think of is to do the trick in d-i, since it already has
>>> the ability to retrieve and load udeb on the fly, and even prompt
>>> users for missing firmware.
>>
>> Maybe even build them using dkms? I saw that you can make d-i build
>> al
On May 24, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
> and help d-i people to handle the brokenness
> if a change in kernel makes the OOT module does not build
This should only happen when a new major version of the kernel comes
out, which means it should only happen in unstable..
And we could make it so
On May 22, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Quoting from the report of our 2009 meeting,
> <20091015123106.ga16...@kyllikki.org>:
>> out of tree modules
>> ---
>>
>> After a somewhat involved discussion taking into account the FTP
>> masters extreme irritation about trying
On May 22, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
>> - debian-installer: branched "zol" from master, and reset master to
>> where it was.
>
> joey@wren:~/src/d-i/installer>git revert
> d8ef3f7047a005aced83ce77d88fb9952b3fea7e
> [master 978ef6d] Revert "Add spl and zfs modules, zfsutils-udeb and
>
On May 22, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Linux has plenty of fine filesystems to choose from already, so this is
> not a must-have.
Ohhh, ouch! But I'm not going to bite... :)
> Also, there are questions as to whether it would be legal.
Legal as in CDDL clashes with GPL you mean?
I'
On May 22, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Le 22/05/2013 14:07, Turbo Fredriksson a écrit :
>
>> But what happened to the commits, where they moved to a separate branch?
>
> I haven't looked closely but, in short, those that would make packages
> unsuitab
On May 22, 2013, at 7:02 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Indeed, some commits probably pertain to branches (as Cyril probably
> already mentioned)mostly if they depend on packages that are not in
> the archive.
I have tried my best to make it work even if they don't. Besides, they
DO exist (most o
* base-installer/master
commit 13a98ab09f15086c28d8080d08389e4e3012e59e
Mount (bind) /proc and /sys as well on target to make sure grub-probe
works correctly. Is nessesary for ZFS...
* partman-zfs/master
commit 1bd59bde47534f2233c683150a1ada3c99fbf71a
Check if /usr is on a separate
On May 21, 2013, at 7:11 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> How about applying as member of the "d-i" team on Alioth, if you
> already have an Alioth account? Or applying for such account if you
> don't. Then push your proposed changes to the "master" branches of the
> various packages they belong to.
The following changes since commit 938ed6c540296252c6a3c4b2807298ca4364794a:
releasing version 72+squeeze1 (2011-11-13 18:55:05 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/FransUrbo/debian-partman-target master
Turbo Fredriksson (1):
Support ZFS when adding
On May 21, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Turbo Fredriksson (1):
> If / or /boot is on ZFS, then we REQUIRE zfs-initramfs.
> + Find rootfstype using findfstype().
My apologies, ignore this. I found the correct way to do
this in partman-zfs instead...
--
To UN
9
22:04:50 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/FransUrbo/debian-grub-installer master
Turbo Fredriksson (1):
If / or /boot is on ZFS, then we REQUIRE zfs-initramfs.
+ Find rootfstype using findfstype().
grub-installer | 10 +++---
1 files chang
odule shouldn't be critical but instead
fail silently - zfs is not a requirenment for installation. (2013-05-12
15:20:54 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/FransUrbo/debian-partman-zfs master
Turbo Fredriksson (1):
* All sub filesystems (all datasets below t
aller master
Turbo Fredriksson (1):
Copy the whole /boot/zfs directory, not just the zpool.cache file.
+ That way, if there's a crypto key in there, it gets copied to.
debian/changelog |7 +++
grub-installer |3 ++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
ror etc). (2013-05-15 17:46:16 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/FransUrbo/debian-grub-installer master
Turbo Fredriksson (1):
if $ROOT/boot/zfs doens't exist (before we try to copy the
zpool.cache file), then create it.
grub-installer |1 +
com/FransUrbo/debian-grub-installer master
Turbo Fredriksson (1):
Make sure that 'grub-probe -t device XXX' only takes the first entry
if there's multiple (as if a mirror etc).
debian/changelog |7 +++
grub-installer |2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+),
r way, have base-installer support it instead of hard
coding 'main'.
The following changes since commit 91c6cf5fe4c7351de4631d98bcd9aab60a43c1b5:
[l10n] [SILENT_COMMIT] Commit changed/added files (2013-04-17 22:34:43 +)
are available in the git repository at:
https://gith
On May 11, 2013, at 12:25 AM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> It seems that partman-zfs isn't quite finished. It
> doesn't create a root filesystem. Only allows you to
> create a volume, and on that put a root fs...
>
> I've added support for creating a root fs, se
I have a problem with my SCSI system. Not really related to
the d-i, but I thought maybe one here could help.
I've tried the new sarge installer with the following command
line (below) from my UltraSPARC-III (Blade 1000) machine.
This machine have one internal FC disk (which have woody
installed
I LIKE it. I HATE it. I LIKE it. I HATE it. I LIKE it.
I HATE it. I LIKE.. EMOTIONS are SWEEPING over me!!
Date: 02 Aug 2004 21:20:00 +0200
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 14
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Typ
Quoting James Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:01:55AM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> > This is anonymous access. I can 'diff' what I have, but not
> > 'update'...
>
> What's the URL to check it out ? I'll t
This is anonymous access. I can 'diff' what I have, but not
'update'...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> * Turbo Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-28 09:02]:
>> A couple of years ago I wrote a patch to give RAID install
>> support to the 'debian-boot
A couple of years ago I wrote a patch to give RAID install
support to the 'debian-boot' system. It was to close to a
release, so nothing happened.
But now I have the exact same problem again, so I thought
I'd give it a shoot. I got 'debian-installer', and are
currently familiarising myself with th
are
/ / | | '_ \| | | \ \/ /Debian Certified Linux Developer
_ /// / /__| | | | | |_| |> < Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\\/ \/_|_| |_|\__,_/_/\_\ Gothenburg/Sweden
class struggle Iran domestic disruption kibo $400 million in gold
bullion
Quoting Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You said the message was:
>
> >
> > > > Wrong disk!
> > > > This is disk 1 of 2 in the drv14-sun4cdm series of 27-Nov-2000 13:18 EST.
> > > > Wrong disk. This is from series drv14-sun4cdm. You need disk 1 of series
> > > > the driver series.
>
> How
Quoting Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > - s n i p -
> > Wrong disk!
> > This is disk 1 of 2 in the drv14-sun4cdm series of 27-Nov-2000 13:18 EST.
> > Wrong disk. This is from series drv14-sun4cdm. You need disk 1 of series
> > the driver series.
> > - s n i p -
> >
> > The m
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.20-2000-12-03
When trying to install the 'Kernel and modules', the kernel is installed from
the (booted) rescue disk, but when asked to insert the modules disk 1, I get
the message enclosed below.
The disks are the correct ones, down loaded from
ftp
51 matches
Mail list logo
