Op Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:42:26 -0400
schreef Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > In previous releases d-i used devfs style device node names, is it
> > true that you have moved away from that? That would simplify the
> > uswsusp maitainer script...
Hi,
[ please CC me ]
In previous releases d-i used devfs style device node names, is it true
that you have moved away from that? That would simplify the uswsusp
maitainer script...
grts Tim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Tue, 08 May 2007 09:58:06 -0300
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only "killer app" for me with usplash is user input during boot - I
> > know usplash (and cryptsetup using usplash) supports it out-of-the-box,
> > does splashy?
I added support for input in splashy already so
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:27:57 +0100
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently tested Etch on a few laptops and I noticed the uswsusp
> resume_device was always
> set to long device (devfs like) names.
>
> I first assumed It was a well known bug for Etch installation, but it doesn't
>
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:02:21 +0200
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > | Anyway, hope this will help you in maintaining the Dutch
> > | translation. The reference to the translation being "too polite"
> > or| not enough vlaams (should this mean that vlaams is rude...?)
> > sounded|
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:01:20 EST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> how can i download linux , I want to experiecnce this software..
>
http://www.debian.org/distrib/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:14:21 -0800
Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:33:57AM -0800, Cardenas wrote:
> > when trying to create a filesystem, I get this: "mkfs.ext3: file not
> > found while trying to create journal"
>
> Already reported as bug #177454.
You can get
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:31:51 -0800
Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This should have been fixed in netcfg-static 0.22. Could you
> please send the version printed when you run
I'm sorry I can't reproduce this bug because I can't get
debian-installer to install the system to the point where
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:21:36 -0700
"Chris Tillman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 09:41:13AM -0500, James Woollen wrote:
>
> > why do you recommend the CD-RW for a one-time install. i will be
> > installing on an older machine that i anticipate will have issues
> > (at least
Package: kernel-installer
Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-08
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Installing the kernel fails with the following error:
unpacking dash (from .../archives/dash_0.4.1_i386.deb)
/target/usr/bin/dpkg: relocation error; /target/lib/libnss_compat.so.2:
Package: install
Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-08
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I've been testing the debian-installer for the last week now. There used
to be a 'mout partitions' option (or something similar) just after the
partioner option. It has vanished. This makes i
On 07 Feb 2003 00:57:17 +0100
Martin Sjögren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you reproduce it and tell me exactly what this particular module
> was called? That would be very helpful. 'cause then we can file an
> evil bug on that package and tell them to change the description. ;)
The offending
Package: install
Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-06
Severity: normal
I'm not sure which package is to blame, so you can figure it out...
In the menu where you can select udebs to download (during network
install), something goes wrong when the description of a package is
longer than the screen. It
Package: di-utils-mount-partitions
Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-06
Severity: important
If I mount the wrong partition on a certain mount point this package
won't let me correct my mistake. Also if I go to a shell and manually
unmount it, the change will not be reflected in the generated
/etc/fst
Package: netcfg-static
Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-06
Severity: normal
The network configuration (which is performed during network install) is
lost when the installation is over and you reboot into the basesystem.
It seems little trouble to generate an /etc/network/interfaces so the
network is
On Thu, 06 Feb 2003 11:49:32 +0100
Mario Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: base-installer
> Version: 0.014
>
> > I: Base system installed successfully
> > /target/usr/bin/apt-get: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: version 'GLIBC_2.1.1'
> > not found (required by /target/lib/lib.so.6)
>
> BTW, it app
Hi,
So I tried to install sarge with the business-card image I found at
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/. I haven't succeeded
yet in getting it installed. The last X times a got stuck at 'installing
the base system', weirdly enough I few days ago I passed this point
successfully...
Hi,
I'm in the process of getting sarge on my new computer. I thought that
would give me a nice chance to do some testing on the new
debian-installer. I used the business-card iso btw. I do have a lot of
comments an want to do some bug reporting, but I don't know which
package to report on. So may
Hi,
I'm trying to use sarge-i386-businesscard.iso that was advertised on
debian-news to install sarge on my new computer. The onboard nic is
however not supported by one of the modules on this image. Now my
question; how can I customize the image to include this driver?
grtjs Tim
--
To UNSUBSC
19 matches
Mail list logo