energy you've put into
d-i.
> I sincerely hope that, at some time, new energies will show up in D-I
> development. We desperately need it.
It seems like that's always the case. :)
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right
t's unlikely to happen.
Indeed.
> Opinions, comments and suggestions welcome.
No objections.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &
ive
> > would reject because it doesn't know about m68k?
>
> Yes, indeed. We can upload to debian-ports, but not to the main archive
> (which is why I suggested not to worry about it ;)
Argh! I forgot about that. Also uploading source to d-ports is only
allowed for unreleased not
f much concern to d-i development anymore these days.
>
> Yes I agree that we shouldn't worry too much about it but if we can keep
> it in sync with rest it is better and makes porter's life easier too.
I can upload it if that would make life easier. :)
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 06:43:03AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Stephen R Marenka (step...@marenka.net):
>
> > FWIW: m68k still builds too [1].
> >
> > [1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/daily/
>
>
> Hmmm, I can't check ri
months. The only arches for which there is any real excuse for this are
FWIW: m68k still builds too [1].
[1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/daily/
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Is there already a way to fire up just the ssh server portion of network
console or something equivalent?
I don't really want to run the whole installer under network-console,
but I would like to be able to ssh in when the installer hangs.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If l
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:30:31PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 26 September 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 09:52:40PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > During installation you basically want to avoid displaying the mirror
> > > list. But y
y be set in config/m68k.cfg.
Sounds like a reasonable solution.
Interesting that I hadn't really thought about *that* bit of the switch
to debian-ports. I use approx, so I changed it once and forgot about it.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 01:12:09PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 07:35:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Friday 30 May 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:08:02PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > > So basically th
; to use only from certain hosts (using from="") and limited to
> allow execution of only certain commands (using command=" Contact DSA if you have such a case.
>
> Your sysadmins
> ---
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
good start could be
> >>> to
> >>> check whether the Sarge installer also has the bug as that has older
> >>> versions of libparted and partman-base.
> >>>
> >>> Otavio: you did that change; any comments?
> >>
> >> I&
l free
to upload the m68k binaries. I'm already happy with the way the
packaging works for now (at least until I've tested it by using it).
I'll go crawl back under my rock for now. :)
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
lt at all than having semi-official builds that deviate from all
| other arches.
Sorry. I'd rather hoped that having sid images would be better than
no images at all.
Maybe we'll have a lenny to build from one day. :)
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:02:53PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:42:58PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >
> >> Please porters, let's start the work for upgrading Debian Instal
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:47:04PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 15 February 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:33:05AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > Following are the packages, architecture specific ones, that needs
> > > uploa
Is there something I'm missing?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
te/zlib_inflate.ko
| some modules are in more than one package
| command exited with status 1
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:32:11PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:54:39AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >
> >> Tomorrow we need to mass upload packages that has translation
>
be checked with
> me. We'll decide together if we do or not each upload.
Would partman-base and partman-partitioning fall into this somewhere?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 06:04:24PM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:29:33PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 04:27:56AM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
> > > I did download and try to boot the m68k build of this installer. The
> >
e're not in as bad of shape as we thought.
> I'm just curious how much RAM I would need to avoid the low-memory
> mode, and if there's anything I'm missing because of that. It's not
> like we could do a graphical install on m68k. We can barely get X
> running a
so see if someone in the Debian m68k community
> would be willing to build CD images using packages from unstable.
What's the procedure for that? At the moment, sid is pretty broken for
installation (we're far behind), but no reason not to start the process.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephe
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:42:59AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> (CCing Stephen as I'm not sure if he's subscribed)
I'm subscribed.
> Recently you committed this change in r50759:
> +partman-base (116) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> +
> + [ Stephen R. Marenka ]
&
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.7
Please apply this one line patch to allow etch-m68k to be installed.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Makefile.orig 2007-11-13 19:51:03.0 -0600
+++ Makefi
The _rtld_global problem is confirmed fixed for m68k.
Thanks!
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:07:56AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:49:37PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > Please show objdump -p /lib/libc.so.6.
> [...]
> > NEEDED ld.so.1
> [...]
>
> And mklibs-readelf -n /lib/libc.so.6.
$ mk
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:50:15PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:29:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:24:11AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > Is there any workaround I can do to get this working again?
> > No id
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:59:37PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:29:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:24:11AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > Is there any workaround I can do to get this working again?
>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:29:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:24:11AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > Is there any workaround I can do to get this working again?
>
> No idea. A not uptodate build environment?
Are you saying the symbol version
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 11:59:43PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:24:14PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > Please find attached.
>
> Yeah.
>
> | D *UND* _rtld_global
> vs.
> | DO *UN
was sort of striving for a bit of that with my changes anyway.
I sort of forgot about debian-cd, although I don't believe it's
currently building anything for m68k. I hope to look at that soonish.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 11:01:00PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 10:10:14AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > No difference, see attached.
>
> Okay. Please show the same from libc.so.6.
Please find attached.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 09:40:23AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:07:48AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > I fired up the latest daily for m68k and ran into the following problem.
> > | /bin/sh: symbol lookup error: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined symbol:
&
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:49:11PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:20:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > P.S. Could you also have a look at the space problem for the m68k floppy
> > images?
>
> There seems to be a /usr/share/acorn directory,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:20:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2007 17:07, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > I fired up the latest daily for m68k and ran into the following
> > problem.
> >
> > | /bin/sh: symbol lookup error: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:20:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2007 17:07, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > I fired up the latest daily for m68k and ran into the following
> > problem.
> >
> > | /bin/sh: symbol lookup error: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined
I fired up the latest daily for m68k and ran into the following problem.
| /bin/sh: symbol lookup error: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined symbol: _rtld_global
Is this a mklibs problem? Any ideas?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it righ
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 03:27:22PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 November 2006 04:02, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > I was wondering if someone can help me out. I started to update
> > linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6 to 2.6.18 and I ran into the following error.
> > I supp
-m68k-2.6
| dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.79
| dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Stephen R. Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| dpkg-buildpackage: source version without epoch 0.79
| fakeroot debian/rules clean
| kernel-wedge gen-control > debian/control
| dh_testdir
| dh_clean `fin
possible now and is even required for
> > partman-auto-crypto.
> > If you would like to add support for it, please see [3]. Feel free
> > to contact me or David Härdeman (Alphix) for help.
> >
> > * mips: keyboard issues
> > We've had a report a
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> m68k: update udebs from 2.6.16-1 to 2.6.16-2
already in archive (0.74)
> add 2.6 kernels to CDs for appropriate subarches
see attached
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
&
ve had my brain fried at the beach.)
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
etty cool. m68k would certainly benefit from it,
whereas I doubt we'll ever get gtk working on all m68k subarchs.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
cial
kernels and installers around if necessary.
In other words, don't worry about holding on to any kernels just for us.
I hope to keep some 2.4 and 2.2 support in d-i until we get everything
moved, but I'll try to keep it out of the way or in a branch.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If lif
dhcp
wireless-essid MY_ESSID
wireless-mode Managed
wireless-key MY_HEX_KEY
If you're using resolvconf, you'll also need entries like
dns-nameservers and dns-search.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On the d-i homepage, the link to other images under beta 2 points
to ftp.debian.org, which is either currently broken or at least
doesn't have m68k (or much else) any more.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sign
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:29:38PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 27 February 2006 14:39, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:46:21PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > Today the 20060218 builds have been installed for all arches, so
> > > tomorrow
&g
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:46:21PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Today the 20060218 builds have been installed for all arches, so tomorrow
Technically still not true, as the m68k build continues to sit in
byhand.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it r
are also being built with the new atari-
bootstrap for your testing pleasure.
[1] <http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/images-m68k/daily/>
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
utomatically generated file and
> lost. Needs followup.
Rats. (Why are automatically generated files in cvs?)
Anyway, thanks to manty for fixing my fix.
m68k/amiga kernels are on the daily sarge cds, so I think this is fixed.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you&#
e `/lib/preseed/preseed.sh', which is also in package
file-preseed
| (Noting disappearance of file-preseed, which has been completely replaced.)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
or come up without a network or such.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
g those too, but I haven't figured out what that's about yet.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
installer
> is great! It was much harder to install MacOS on the machine than Debian
> Linux afterwards.
Cool! Thanks for your feedback.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 11:31:29PM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >I've tried to document all the "magic" in
> ><http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.m68k/index.html>.
> But, I tried finding the string "initrd22"
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 09:27:57PM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
> Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
> >Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >>On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 08:25:03PM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
> >>>Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >>>>On Thu, Oct 28, 2
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 08:25:03PM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:50:44AM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
> >>As per Joey's request I've downloaded the daily build of the debian
> >>installer initial ramdi
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:50:44AM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
> As per Joey's request I've downloaded the daily build of the debian
> installer initial ramdisk image, and the kernel, and retried the
> installation.
Exactly which image from which day?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
y gotten this one.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
me boot floppies need root to build, so cannot be built by default
> +# $(BVMEROOT) $(BVMEBOOT) $(MVME147BOOT) $(MVME147ROOT) $(MVME16XBOOT)
> $(MVME16XROOT)
If you want to punt vme, so be it. I'd rather see the release than have
me hold it up for anything. Hopefully, we can catch it
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:22:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> partitioner (m68k mips or s390)
> (has code changes, should be tested before upload)
> vmelilo-installer (m68k)
done.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:43:26PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> What other architectures besides i386 and powerpc are updated well
> enough to avoid such a warning?
I think m68k is in pretty good shape.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
&
I've just committed a workaround for #269077 to rootskel. It only
affects 2.2 kernels.
It should be properly fixed, but now probably isn't the time.
Would someone please upload?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it righ
ppreciated.
linux-kernel-di packages an existing kernel in a udeb. I think you're
expected to have the kernel package specified in kernel-versions
installed on your system. Short of that, you probably can place the
kernel and modules in the same type place with the same names.
--
Stephen R. Ma
the old stuff from the m68k
reorg yet. 2.2.25/2.4.27 is correct. common-kernels is the only place
need to change kernel versions now.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ccelerator
cards with small ST-RAM, allows loading the ramdisk to TT/FastRAM,
fixes Load-to-TTRAM GEMDOS header flag and more. (Thanks Petr!)
3) q40 hasn't been tested. I haven't even told Richard Zidlicky that I'm
building images yet. No bootloader or documentation. I'm sl
iously really is a bug in busybox init, hence my previous
> suggestion to try and fix that one.
I wonder if it's not because inittab has respawn for vc/3 & vc/4?
Do you see an easier solution than to pass a kernel parameter? Is there
one you're already passing that we could overloa
, and on top
> of that the installation was 1,5 to 2 times faster.
Progress!
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
or me.
Do you really need to delete the extra vc devices?
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> Macintoshes is 2.2.25-mac, and ext3 support has not been compiled into
> that AFAIK.
ext3 is indeed compiled into the 2.2.25-mac kernel (as of
kernel-image-2.2.25-mac 2.2.25-4). I use it regularly.
Glad you finally got it installed.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.gz
floppy-root.img.gz
netboot-initrd.gz
tftplilo.conf
tftplilo.mvme
tftplilo.txt
vmlinuz-2.2.25-mvme16x
vmlinuz-2.4.26-mvme16x
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTE
st cds staring with 0816 are now working.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s
> root.bin, root22.bin and manifest. amiboot and linux.bin aren't there.
> Probably would be handy if I had these files :)
Hopefully I have fixed this bug in cvs. I'll let you know when it's
fixed for sure.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not f
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 11:54:39PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 06:49:03AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 11:17:22PM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > > - Added support for more subarches for arm (riscpc, riscstation),
in linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.61 and in the daily
builds.
The following from the checklist are okay.
mac cdrom22
mac hd-media
mac nativehd
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Does this machine usually run linux? If so, what version of the kernel?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 01:38:57PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > I was cleaning up the m68k portion of the installation manual and
> > deleted some old entities. Unfortunately, that causes all the
> > translations to fail to build.
> >
> &g
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
instance. I far as I can tell, m68k is the only arch using it.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is bug remains. If ya'll don't have further
evidence, then this bad boy seems closed.
Woo hoo!
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 01:31:13AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (20/07/04 10:31), Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > nc -l -p 2080 -e /bin/sh
> > on tty2 or whatever suits.
> Thanks Stephen
>
> I used the above on tty2, which from the man page I understand means
to busybox now, so you can always go with something
like
nc -l -p 2080 -e /bin/sh
on tty2 or whatever suits.
hth,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 05:47:34PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Simon Richter will look after m68k/Amiga a bit.
Yeah!!!
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
;
> DEBUG: configure archdetect, status: 2
Okay, that's potentially worrisome. Can you tell me exactly what image
you're using so I can try to reproduce it?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
m and perhaps the mount
point to / for the first partition formatted.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 11:04:05AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > Well on my autobuilders buildd has sudo rights. I don't know if this is
> > still policy everywhere or just a holdover. I can switch to a dd, mke2fs
> > scheme, at least for the
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:11:38AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > If this was a normal package, I'd binNMU it to get the fixed images
> > available for testing. Since I can't do that, I've put them at
> > <http://people.debian.or
ehd-initrd.gz
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a).
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ive.
Unfortunately, the only build workaround that I'm aware of requires
root.
dd
mke2fs
sudo mount -o loop
sudo cp
sudo umount
gzip
Ideas welcome.
Thanks,
Stephen
- --
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-B
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 09:25:26PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:48:57AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > It seems to be eject-udeb. I'd file a bug, but I'm not sure what to say.
>
> You should now just need to arrange for 2.0.13deb-5.1 to b
ernels, but it could be made to work
otherwise.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
i-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=250578>.
As far as I know, these images have never been tested and may well not
work. I've completed as much of the m68k/vme port of debian-installer
as I can for now. The rest is up to you.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doi
ase file after you add in your stuff.
hth,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 11:15:05AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > Can anyone help me out here?
> >
> > The cdrom images on m68k are failing to build with the following.
> >
> > | LOCPATH=./tmp/cdrom/tree/usr/lib/locale LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 redu
: 6/16
| error -1 at position 523495 (bytes: 16 Used chars: 1928 (523495 processed)
The full log is at
<http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/images-m68k/daily/build_cdrom.log>.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PR
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 04:24:06PM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > The m68k/atari port is now building with the dailies, so both the image
> > and iso links may be updated appropriately.
> >
> > The m68k/vme ports now have a test build with i
s,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 03:04:53PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-18 08:44]:
> > Unfortunately, I didn't pay enough attention to the fact that partconf
> > uses parted also. Since no support for atari exists in parted, d-
1 - 100 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
