Re: 3.0.18 testing needed

2001-12-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
>> >> en pt de pl fr es ja sv it hu >> >> no jp there > > What do you think ja is ? > java? dunno -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 3.0.18 testing needed

2001-12-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 16-Dec-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote: > "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Will you add i18n for jp? Or do they build special bf anyways? Just >> curious. > > The i18n builds do include Japanese support. Is that what you w

Re: 3.0.18 testing needed

2001-12-15 Thread Sean &#x27;Shaleh&#x27; Perry
Will you add i18n for jp? Or do they build special bf anyways? Just curious. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

FW: Comments from a first-time Debian install.....

2000-12-04 Thread Sean &#x27;Shaleh&#x27; Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not on any of the Debian developer's mailing lists yet, and I didn't want to send this to some inappropriate place. (I'd really rather not replicate RMS's drive-by flaming on the tcl list from a few years ago. :-) However, I thought some Debian developers might app

Bug#75505: base: mod(utils?)conf should not overwrite /etc/m

2000-10-24 Thread Sean &#x27;Shaleh&#x27; Perry
On 24-Oct-2000 KoV wrote: > Package: base > Version: 20001024 > Severity: normal > > I think modules.conf should not be overwritten on an upgrade of it's utils > I always lost every configuration I have done for my soundcard and my isdn > modules whenever I upgrade to new versions of modutils (m

RE: BRAILLE IMPLIMENTATION AT BOOTUP.

2000-10-09 Thread Sean &#x27;Shaleh&#x27; Perry
On 06-Oct-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello!! > I am one of those blind guys that wish it would be posible to boot linux > and have a view of whats happening from the first time to the last. > NOw i am only posible to use the brailledisplay at consolemode. > I know someone here was writing

RE: regarding xviddetect

2000-08-21 Thread Sean &#x27;Shaleh&#x27; Perry
On 21-Aug-2000 Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > I know there are still plenty of video cards that xviddetect does not > detect. I can see a lot of bug reports to that effect. > > I think it would be worthwhile to maintain a branch of xviddetect so > that anXious could know about more videocards which

Re: regarding xviddetect

2000-08-21 Thread Sean &#x27;Shaleh&#x27; Perry
On 21-Aug-2000 Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Sean Perry wrote: >> This is all moot if we move to X 4. X does it own monitor / vid card >> detection now. > > I wonder if it doesn't make more sense to use a mixed X3/X4 setup for > woody and base the decision on which server to use on the i

Re: regarding xviddetect

2000-08-21 Thread Sean &#x27;Shaleh&#x27; Perry
This is all moot if we move to X 4. X does it own monitor / vid card detection now. So, for potato, as much work as we see fit should go there. For woody, let's help Branden get Xfree 4 working. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Re: confusing message during disk format

2000-07-19 Thread Sean &#x27;Shaleh&#x27; Perry
> > Ugh.Unfortunately, the YesNoBox doesn't support defaulting to No. > Can't we just change the wording maybe? > I am trying to avoid an action, yet clicking yes? That is plain wrong. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

confusing message during disk format

2000-07-18 Thread Sean &#x27;Shaleh&#x27; Perry
During install there is a question that asks: "Would you like me to not check the drive for errors?" or something real close. It defaults to Yes and skips the lengthy drive check. My problem with this message is that it is very confusing. It should read: "Would you like the drive to be check