Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages

2023-10-05 Thread Russ Allbery
been ABI updates anyway, particularly in stable. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Bug#994409: task-laptop: please recommend automatic apt proxying

2021-09-15 Thread Russ Allbery
those machines. We should not enable people who control the local network but not the Debian system to dynamically change security-relevant configuration of that system, which I believe includes apt sources, without explicit permission. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Re: Heads-up: new lintian error: no-human-maintainers

2019-04-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Sean Whitton writes: > On Mon 22 Apr 2019 at 11:03AM -07, Russ Allbery wrote: >> This was a request from ftpmaster so that they had a contact point for >> each package in the case of any problems. If they're happy for this >> requirement to be removed for d-i packa

Re: Heads-up: new lintian error: no-human-maintainers

2019-04-22 Thread Russ Allbery
equirement to be removed for d-i packages, we're happy to update Policy accordingly. Presumably the d-i team is the contact for anything related to udebs, so that may fulfill their requirement. (If they're unhappy, we should talk more about it.) -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Re: Bug#758234: debian-policy: allow packages to depend on packages of lower priority

2017-07-02 Thread Russ Allbery
; priority. I believe this is #776557 (and kind of unrelated to this discussion). Maybe move this discussion there? There's already been a fair bit of (rather inconclusive) discussion on that bug. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Re: Bug#758234: debian-policy: allow packages to depend on packages of lower priority

2017-07-02 Thread Russ Allbery
tional may conflict with each other (but packages that both have a priority of standard or higher still may not conflict). -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Re: Bug#758234: debian-policy: allow packages to depend on packages of lower priority

2017-06-28 Thread Russ Allbery
re need to document that the priority still exists. Hm, it occurs to me that this wording should probably explicitly say that the extra priority should be treated the same as optional if it appears anywhere (although the archive-wide override change will mostly take care of that). -- Russ Allbery

Re: Bug#758234: debian-policy: allow packages to depend on packages of lower priority

2017-06-25 Thread Russ Allbery
es -(excluding build-time dependencies). In order to ensure this, the -priorities of one or more packages may need to be adjusted. - - -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

2015-08-18 Thread Russ Allbery
; initially thought that images.debian.org is more generic, but it's > also likely to confuse people into looking there for pictures... :-) install.debian.org? (get.debian.org is good too.) -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Re: Bug#699808: tech-ctte: syslinux vs the wheezy release

2013-02-06 Thread Russ Allbery
ading this can fill it in from memory. *grin*) If we could find a way to release some of that tension, that would be great, but it's a hard problem, and there's no way that we're going to come up with a solution to it right now in the middle of the wheezy freeze. -- Russ Allbery (r..

Re: Bug#699808: tech-ctte: syslinux vs the wheezy release

2013-02-06 Thread Russ Allbery
and we don't like a lot of the implications of that, but we don't know how to do better and get releases out faster because there's a truly intimidating amount of work that has to get done to do the release and all the alternatives seem to make the work even worse. -- Russ Allbery (r.

Re: Bug#699808: tech-ctte: syslinux vs the wheezy release

2013-02-06 Thread Russ Allbery
e buildds at testing since there would be no way to stage library transitions that *are* going into the release, so let me note that this is not a well-thought-out proposal, just the sketch of an idea.) But that's all outside the scope of tech-ctte deliberation, since that's technical d

Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning

2011-12-16 Thread Russ Allbery
ut I think there's a pretty good consensus that people with a separate /usr from / are doing so for fairly edge-case situations, such as wanting a partially encrypted file system, and hence are not the target audience for the pre-constructed partitioning choices in d-i. -- Russ Allbery

Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning

2011-12-15 Thread Russ Allbery
ry if they're not on the same partition as everything else. Separating /var continues to be good and recommended practice if you're running anything that's likely to produce a lot of output, IMO. (/tmp should probalby just be tmpfs, but that's another discussion.) -- R

Re: Package-Type not included in udebs

2010-05-15 Thread Russ Allbery
eplaced by a xc-package-type-in-debian-control that suggests to do the > opposite and use the official name. Done for the next Lintian release (as a pedantic tag, since as I understand it there's no functionality change). d-i folks, if you want a higher severity, let us know. Thanks, Raphae

Bug#535197: installation-reports: Successful installation on HP Firebird 802

2009-06-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: installation-reports Severity: wishlist -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version: lenny i386 netinst CD (unknown exact build date or URL) Date: 2009-06-27 Machine: HP Firebird with VoodooDNA 802 Partitions: /dev/mapper/gwaihir-root ext320647548 3659096