ng to contribute a (detailed) list of points.
Please file bugs against release-notes in the BTS making sure to
indicate that this is information about the install in the title.
Cheers,
Rob
--
Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &
o a 2.2 series or better Linux kernel before proceeding with the upgrade.
Nor this.
Some how you're not looking at the sarge branch there. I followed your
link, and that looked fine but you musnt choose to download HEAD. As
that currently has the woody version.
Cheers,
Rob
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFBSfH6gm/Kwh6ICoQRAjUTAKCTHUCrwWWG5x0NXHSCMLEE6LYlTQCfUXSY
> ZSgVlqnyDTJ1YPZPtT/ayF4=
> =7pJK
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
--
Rob Bradford - http://robster.org.uk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 02:13:07PM +0200, thijs wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I've installed Sarge using d-i RC1 on an old Pentium (I) system.
> Everything went fine, which is good! There's one minor thing though: the
> installed kernel was a 386-kernel, while it coul
Hi,
On my initial reading of the postinst script for the base-installer
package it should install an smp kernel on systems which have multiple
processors mentioned in dmesg. However I think that at no point in the
installer does it indicate thats its installing such a kernel.
Your bug report ind
Package: base-installer
Severity: normal
Just from inspection of the debian/postinst file it appears that the m68k
kernel choosing code is incomplete, possibly as a stub, compared to other
archs'
i.e.
m68k)
case "$SUBARCH" in
amiga|atari|mac|bvme6000|mvme147|mvme16x|q40|sun3|sun3x)
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:53:52PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > It saves me a reboot, and speeds up the install.
>
> That saves time only until you discover, after labourously installing
> all of debian, that the boot loader failed to install properly and you
> then hav
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 12:54:54AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Perhaps it would be an idea to add 'grub' to the build depend list, to
> make it more obvious that this package require grub to be usefull? Or
> perhaps just make it architecture independant, as there is nothing in
> the packa
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 21:47, Bastian Blank wrote:
> hi folks
>
> we discuss about devfs or not devfs in the installed system.
> we currently map any devfs path to the non devfs variant. the count of
> map definitions will grow if we want to support more special hardware.
> so the question is, why
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 22:15, Josip Rodin wrote:
*snip*
> > > The situation is similar with the release notes, which just need a few
> > > tags to be able to skip some info for architectures recently released.
> >
> > Yes, ditto.
Great. Having the release notes in b-f cvs always seemed illogical
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 20:47, Rob Bradford wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 16:32, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 09:07:44AM -0600, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote:
> But make lint-docs works fine, as you say. Hhhhm. Does make
> install-manual-html for for you?
Oops.
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 16:32, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 09:07:44AM -0600, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote:
> > Repository: boot-floppies/documentation/en
> > who:robster
> > time: Sun Sep 22 09:07:44 MDT 2002
> > Log Message:
> > Made some minor changes with respec
On Sun, 2002-05-05 at 17:43, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Package: install-doc
> Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-05
> Severity: normal
>
> The section describing the various install CDs and what they boot needs
> to be updated (for i386).
>
> We realized that the isolinux multiboot method seems to fa
This is a final call for changes to the release notes that should be
commited before the 1st of May to get to me within 24 hours, most people
have already sent me anything if relevent. I dont know when the CDs will
be generated but i suspect enough time should be left between you
sending me change
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 04:18, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote:
> Repository: boot-floppies/documentation
> who:cklin
> time: Sat Apr 20 20:18:39 PDT 2002
> Log Message:
> Remove the redundant 'xtide' entry recently introduced into the list of
> split packages.
>
>
> Files:
> chan
The APT thing is now resolved, it details installing apt first (and
debconf).
Cheers
--
Rob 'robster' Bradford
http://robster.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi, this is not release notes but installation manual. Adam, are you
looking after this?
--
Rob 'robster' Bradford
http://robster.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
> Please think of us for a moment before submitting such patches (and
> reformatting large paragraphs after deleting a word). I am sure that
> robster had all the best intentions and were not at all aware of this
> side effect when submitting the patch. Of course the SGML source should
> not be al
> So, any good reasons against it? If no, I will go ahead and change the
> defaults.
>
So long as there is a symlink /dev/cdrom to the apropriate device and
the /etc/fstab uses this ratehr than /dev/hdc or whatever.
Progeny Debian did this by default.
Thanks
--
Rob 'robster' Bradford
http://ro
On Sat, 2002-02-09 at 11:38, MaX wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm searching for an unofficial boot floppy for potato with support for the promise
>controller (Ata100)
>
> someone can send me an address?
>
> Another question:
> woody can support ata100 diring the installation?
>
> tnx
> MaX
Hey.
Is t
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 00:32, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020204 19:55]:
> > > Using the basedebs.tgz resulted in the installer complaining that
> > > gunzip failed. I gzipped the file and everything worked.
> > >
> &
> Using the basedebs.tgz resulted in the installer complaining that gunzip
> failed. I gzipped the file and everything worked.
>
Methinks you useda buggy browser, some versions of netscape and mozilla
are known to ungzip the file when the download occurs. This is not a bug
on this debian packag
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 02:15, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote:
> Repository: boot-floppies/documentation
> who:toff
> time: Sun Jan 27 18:15:42 PST 2002
> Log Message:
> add Javi input from 13 Dec, touch up
>
> Files:
> changed:release-notes.sgml
Cool. :)
Thanks
--
Rob 'robster
On Sun, 2002-01-27 at 21:30, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote:
> Repository: boot-floppies/documentation
> who:robster
> time: Sun Jan 27 13:30:19 PST 2002
> Log Message:
> Major formatting cleanup. Lets get cracking!
>
This is basically the cue for everyone to look at the release
Heh. What a mess. It seemed 3 days before I commited to cvs using the
woody tag, which it was suggested for me to do, by someone who shall
remain nameless, toff commited my work to cvs under the head branch.
So, having read the threads the correct solution IMHO is to merge the
two branches which
24 matches
Mail list logo
