> I think everyone on this list is aware of how copyleft works.
Yeah sorry about that. I wasn't trying to be facetious.
> I suspect
> Joey meant that it was sanest for it also to be under "GPL v2 or later"
> rather than "GPL v2 only" or "GPL v3 only" or "GPL v3 or later", all of
> which would be
On 9/29/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bdale is the original author of elilo-installer, although it's derived
> from lilo-installer. [...]
> Since lilo-installer is licensed under the GPL version 2 or later, I
> suggest it's sanest for elilo-installer to have the same license.
If elil
p!
Cheers,
Peter.
Author: Steve Langasek
Date: 2007-09-29 07:56 +800
To: debian-legal
Subject: Re: elilo-installer copyright status
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:33:11PM +0800, Peter Rock wrote:
> I'm requesting help to verify whether or not the package
> "elilo-in
3 matches
Mail list logo
