Re: Bug#1029843: live-boot: Devices Requiring Firmware: multiple requested files in single line overlapping / special characters

2023-05-08 Thread Pete Batard
On 2023.05.08 21:02, Lennart Sorensen wrote: Well devicetree is part of open firmware aka IEEE-1275, from 1994. ACPI is from 1996. Interesting; TIL. I guess I'm probably not the only person who thought DT was something that was only cooked recently by Linux kernel maintainers, since that's w

Re: Bug#1029843: live-boot: Devices Requiring Firmware: multiple requested files in single line overlapping / special characters

2023-05-08 Thread Pete Batard
Well, I guess at this stage, and to help provide some more context about the DT vs ACPI conundrum, I'm going to stop tiptoeing around the literal elephant in the room, but not without first adding a preliminary notice that I wasn't privy to whatever discussions occurred with regards to the SBBR

Re: Bug#1029843: live-boot: Devices Requiring Firmware: multiple requested files in single line overlapping / special characters

2023-05-05 Thread Pete Batard
Hi James, Since we're getting off-topic, and I don't think there's much of this reply that's going to be relevant to it, I dropped the CC to bug 1035392. On 2023.05.04 14:16, James Addison wrote: Yep, and for those situations, that's a point in favour of the third "System Table Selection" val

Bug#1035392: Bug#1029843: live-boot: Devices Requiring Firmware: multiple requested files in single line overlapping / special characters

2023-05-03 Thread Pete Batard
Hello all and sorry for pinging in late into this conversation. First of all, as someone who noticed the original issue but never got around to properly report or investigate it, a big thanks go to the people here who have been devoting time and effort trying to get to the bottom of it, and of

Bug#985956: Merge request submittted to initramfs-tools

2021-04-16 Thread Pete Batard
I can try to submit a pull request for linux if needed, but I may need some guidance. I'm going to drop trying to submit a pull request for the linux package for the time being, as I can't quite seem to manage to get the required process to insert CONFIG_MDIO_BCM_UNIMAC=m where it should appea

Bug#985956: Merge request submittted to initramfs-tools

2021-04-16 Thread Pete Batard
On 2021.04.16 14:04, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 17:28 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Hello, Pete Batard, le jeu. 15 avril 2021 16:11:02 +0100, a ecrit: Quite a few people are negatively affected by this bug, and one can expect a lot more to be if Debian 11 goes to release

Bug#985956: Merge request submittted to initramfs-tools

2021-04-15 Thread Pete Batard
Note that this is a rather critical regression (since it used to work fine with previous bullseye ISOs), that is currently preventing installation of Debian on the Raspberry Pi 4, i.e. by far the most widespread ARM64 platform out there. Quite a few people are negatively affected by this bug,

Bug#963150: Bug can be closed

2020-08-17 Thread Pete Batard
We confirm that this bug, which is a duplicate of https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967918, can be closed as we validated that the latest Debian testing netsint.iso resolves the aforementioned issue.

Bug#968401: partman-efi version 85: fstab/efi is missing the executable flag

2020-08-14 Thread Pete Batard
Package: partman-efi Severity: important Tags: d-i Logging a bug against this, since it's a rather important issue. https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-efi/-/commit/1a096e6ede94cce8e5272e31946a506ae7f611e7.patch had the rather unfortunate side effect of removing the +x attribute fro

Bug#963156: Patch submitted

2020-08-05 Thread Pete Batard
Hi Adrian, On 2020.08.05 07:48, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 8/5/20 1:47 AM, Pete Batard wrote: A patch for this issue has now been submitted in: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967918 A new report was created since we ultimately propose to fix this in partman-efi

Bug#963156: Patch submitted

2020-08-04 Thread Pete Batard
A patch for this issue has now been submitted in: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967918 A new report was created since we ultimately propose to fix this in partman-efi instead of partman-auto.

Bug#967918: [PATCH] Remount /cdrom read-write if it also happens to be used as /boot/efi

2020-08-04 Thread Pete Batard
As such so we would greatly appreciate if this patch could be reviewed and applied quickly. Thank you, /Pete From dff3328ce6243956254e1d71e7b72dc93ce0c103 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pete Batard Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:12:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remount /cdrom read-write if it also hap

Bug#963156: Would appreciate an update

2020-08-03 Thread Pete Batard
Since we haven't seen any progress or update on this from Debian, we're sending a reminder that, as per https://github.com/pftf/RPi4/issues/76, this issue is still very much active for us and an actual showstopper for the installation of Debian 11 on the Pi 4, using the regular Debian setup uti

Bug#963150: /cdrom should be remounted rw before partman executes, when mapped to an ESP

2020-06-20 Thread Pete Batard
On 2020.06.20 14:49, Andrei POPESCU wrote: Control: reassign -1 debian-installer On Vi, 19 iun 20, 18:36:33, Pete Batard wrote: Package: partman Severity: important Tags: d-i 'partman' is not a "real" package, reassigning accordingly. Ah yes, I found that after I o

Bug#963156: /cdrom should be remounted rw before partman executes, when mapped to an ESP

2020-06-19 Thread Pete Batard
Package: partman-auto Severity: important Tags: d-i (NB: Resubmitting this bug, which was already submitted as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963150, against partman-auto since "partman" does not appear to exist as a valid Debian package) THE GOAL When installin