A thought: The patch from #303914 might have to be partially undone in
order to (re)admit partitionable md devices.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I just ran into this after, over a period of two days, trying to figure
out why D-I / partman doesn't allow me to partition /dev/md0, and why it
would not even recognize a manual partitioning created via `cfdisk`.
I think it would be very useful if partman supported partitionable md
devices. I
Erik Steffl wrote:
> That's why I think it is better to use standard names, even though some
> of them might be objectionable from certain perspectives.
But that's the point! The name is objectionable from a technical
perspective: it's unnecessarily long and bulky. We are not writing
"Germany (F
Branden Robinson wrote:
> We have nothing to gain by taking sides political conflicts like this.
> [...]
> If some governmental interest needs to bowdlerize our distribution to
> satisify their political sensibilities, they can go ahead.
IMO, this is really not about taking sides, and I think it's
4 matches
Mail list logo
