On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:53:03PM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 14:39, Jim Mintha wrote:
> > I would love to get rid of the two versions of the libraries. The
> > last time I believe there were problems with some packages not working
> > well with
t time I believe there were problems with some packages not working
well with the UTF8 version. I have to look at it again to remember
exactly what. This is the time to fix it. My feeling is that with
some work and coordination this should be possible. I will look over
the history tonight to re
sion would
explicitely use it.
libslang.so.1-UTF8 is a terrible soname. Why not just have
libslang-utf8.so.1?
This way packages that can handle utf8 properly can use this library,
and when the regular slang can be fixed properly then can just return
to using that lib
There seem to be a whole bunch of problems with the utf8 slang
packages. People are having trouble with slrn, lynx, etc. Possibly
these packages just need to be recompiled but the following seems more
serious:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 11:36:38PM +0200 , Jim Mintha wrote:
> > I just
!
I just uploaded them. (I just realized that i missed adding the
Closes, but I'll do it by hand) Let me know if there are problems.
Jim
--
Jim Mintha Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Administrator Work: +31 20 525-4919
In
> > I hope the maintainer of slang1, Jim Mintha, will provide it for us
> > as well as Enrique will do with newt. But if it can not be done,
> > we'll need something to use. So I'll prepare to work on slang1-utf8.
>
> I have been following the discussions.
;
> Thanks! Since Enrique said that he will upload the newt packages
> with utf-8 support, the rest is just one: slang1 with utf-8 support.
>
> I hope the maintainer of slang1, Jim Mintha, will provide it for us
> as well as Enrique will do with newt. But if it can not be done,
>
7 matches
Mail list logo
