On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:34:34 +
Richard Hirst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 12:21:56AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > Getting d-i to work on other arches than i386 is high-priority.
>
> I know talk is cheap, but I do intend to work on d-i for hppa and ia64.
> Just a ma
On 30 Aug 2002 17:05:52 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jim Lynch
>
> | Over the past few days, I tried to build debian-installer, and
> | subtracting some minor frustrations that could have been cleared up
> | in the docs, it was pretty easy
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 21:09:22 -0400
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:42:30PM -0700, Jim Lynch wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:46:41 -0400
> > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I am in complete agre
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 11:26:35 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
Hi
> I am running into a problem during installation - the initial part of
> the installation - where the system simply boots. I am trying to
> install the Woody distro with a 2.4xx kernel. (I can make the system
> instal
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:46:41 -0400
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:09:08AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> > #include
> > Matt Zimmerman wrote on Mon Jul 29, 2002 um 09:00:42AM:
> >
> > > What is the basis for your objection? Are you going to try to stop
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:22:34 +0200
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #include
Greetings :)
Why is it that you think debian-installer is somehow worse than
boot-floppies? Have you tried to build either? See below.
> Nice. I have seen how motivation disappears when you are waiting
> l
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:59:37 +0200
"Xerath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Im getting this error ever time I boot
>
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 030 current
>-> tss.cr3 = 001, %cr3 = 00101000
> *pde =
> Oops:0002
> CPU : 0
> EIP: 001
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:54:01 +0200 (CEST)
Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
Hi!
> But isn't packages in SID which will be merged into woody?
No. Woody is -released-. If they were not already, they never will be.
> Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:30:15 +0200
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #include
Greetings :)
> Anthony Towns wrote on Tue Jul 16, 2002 um 04:53:26PM:
>
> > > > > We can stick with boot-floppies for Woody+1 and release
> > > > > Debian-4.0 with DI ;)
>From what I have read of the diffic
On 16 Jul 2002 17:09:25 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> other arches like mips, mipsel, hppa, s390, arm etc will have to be
> taken care of by people who know those arches. The same goes for our
> Hurd and *BSD people -- if you want to release with woody + 1, you
> will have t
10 matches
Mail list logo
