On 9/7/2021 12:58 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Hello,
Le 05/09/2021 à 18:47, J. William Campbell a écrit :
AFAIK, the on disk format for ext4 is the same as ext2. If the code
can read an ext2 filesystem, it can read an ext4 filesystem.
I am not sure about that. AFAIK, some ext4 features such
On 9/5/2021 6:41 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 09:00:52AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 21:43:50 +0100
Steve McIntyre wrote:
Ummm. In my experience quite a number of older armel/armhf devices
booting using U-Boot may *not* be able to boot using ext4.
I don
On 9/4/2021 4:47 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 14:00:06 -0700
"J. William Campbell" wrote:
but if we are talking about a
/boot partition, there is no good reason to change it to ext4.
Ext4 is reliable than ext2, I guess. And, /boot needs it.
Ext4 is more reliable
On 9/4/2021 1:44 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 9/4/21 22:32, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:33:37 +0200
Ben Hutchings wrote:
This is bug #985463.
If we can confirm no architecture has a limit to use ext2 now,
then we can change it to ext4, right?
I may have missed
will be again!
Best Regards,
J. William Campbell
Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:04:01AM -0800, J. William Campbell wrote:
Hi Sven,
Thanks for the comments. I think you are correct that it is at least an
interrupt assignment problem.
Cool.
I
bus on the other. The boards therefore are pci from the kernel point of view,
all VME stuff is inside a driver.
Best Regards,
J. William Campbell
Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:46:37AM -0800, J. William Campbell wrote:
Hi Sven,
I don't know if this will hel
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: vmlinuz-prep.initrd from
people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/netboot/vmlinuz-prep.initrd
uname -a: never got this far
Date: 18-December-2004, all day long more or less
Method: TFTP of local copy of vmlinuz-prep.initrd
7 matches
Mail list logo
